中人网
标题: Method Bias的文献 [打印本页]
作者: myth1949 时间: 2011-10-13 22:51
标题: Method Bias的文献
本帖最后由 myth1949 于 2011-10-13 22:52 编辑 . g; t) T d. U+ l: i
( _+ A' v. ?3 Q7 a7 l* p& fAvolio, B.J.,Yammarino, F.J. & Bass, B.M. (1991), ‘Identifying common methods variancewith data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue’, Journalof Management, 17(3), 571-587.
5 M7 N/ I! j% M& {' H" [+ _
3 p" ~' n; B$ w+ S# WBagozzi, R.P.& Yi, Y. (1990), ‘Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethodmatrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work’, Journal ofApplied Psychology, 75(5), 547-560
$ H, U' q0 J9 I6 W! f8 v
3 g+ j: b+ s3 e7 q6 f/ ], P. y
Campbell, J.P.(1982), ‘Editorial: Some remarks from the outgoing editor’, Journal of AppliedPsychology, 67(6), 691-700.
, I3 z9 s( j+ G1 I E& n, I: Z) b, b. |' O( c
Campbell, D.T.& Fiske, D.W. (1959), ‘Convergent and discriminant validation by themultitrait-multimethod matrix’, Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.
" `2 Z( A4 Q( r: Y# z5 Y" D
: f! O) d0 c7 R' uChurchill,G.A.(1979), ‘A paradigm for developing better measures of marketingconstructs’, Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73.
5 H# u3 ^# a" `
0 M5 n1 U+ D. U. _. h" ^
Crampton, S.,& Wagner, J.A. (1994) Percept-percept inflation in microorganizationalresearch: An investigation of prevalence and effect, Journal of AppliedPsychology, 79(1), 67-76.
& L4 u4 L8 |/ _# [6 \/ |/ Q; ^9 f
0 T4 N8 s; D3 g/ N1 ^. J8 R$ p" g5 v! \Cote, J. A., &Buckley, M. R. (August 1987). ‘Estimating trait, method, and error variance:Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies’ Journal of MarketingResearch, 24, 315-8.
5 i4 z) ~0 d2 t; k' h; V
. s& [( \3 n* |Cote, J. A., &Buckley, M. R. (March 1988), ‘Measurement error and theory in consumerresearch: An illustration of the importance of construct validation’ Journal ofConsumer Research, 14, 579-582.
2 B: T( z6 u: u& P. _5 z' m5 c. Y0 R. d2 E g# T
Donaldson, S. I.and Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2002), ‘Understanding self-report bias inorganizational behavior research’, Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2),245-260.
" W+ e5 `* Q. i) D
7 p/ U! {6 n2 r9 f( J, T0 i
Doty, D. H., &Glick, W. H. (1998). Common methods bias: Does common methodsvariance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1,374-406.
0 Y3 F4 q7 I! a! n8 |7 U; S2 Y8 s7 i( M% H
Evans, M. (1985),‘A monte carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderatedmultiple regression analysis’, Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionsProcesses, 36, 305-323.
' Z- i. H5 n' Z4 X, k7 ^, L
7 Y7 P: Y6 L/ L4 pGlick, W.H.,Jenkins, G.D. JR & Gupta, N. (1986), ‘Method versus substance: How strongare underlying relations between job characteristics and attitudinal outcomes’,Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 441-464.
7 j9 _4 c- }3 _
, L: Z$ o# F8 U: ~8 ?Howard, G. S.(1994), ‘Why do people say nasty things about self-reports?’ Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 15, 399-404.
" i2 |. g" R; k6 F6 F; ?) K" z3 h+ V# S0 M
Johns, G.(1994),‘How often were you absent? A review of the use of self-reported absence data’,Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 574-591.
8 B4 T. O8 f4 N6 X$ k
/ L m7 F" p( S" B* t& @, |# ]
Kline, T.J.B,Sulsky, L.M., & Rever-Moriyama, S.D. (July 2000), ‘Common methodvariance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection’, TheJournal of Psychology, 34(4), 401-421.
+ k) G) i) D. ^3 j$ W
- \9 e) R* K3 |, a5 C: H2 [
MacKenzie, S. B.(Summer 2003), ‘The dangers of poor construct conceptualization’ Academy for MarketingScience Journal, 31, 3.
9 d- U7 J6 e0 h- G- J7 d4 h0 ?9 x O# r! J" Y, g4 e1 j
Meade, A. W.,Watson, A.M., & Kroustalis, C.M., ‘Assessing common method bias in organizational research’, paperpresented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial andOrganizational Psychology, New York.
8 i0 s( r t6 M# Q. C5 b% r- R" Q |. A6 v4 j
Podsakoff, P.M.,MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., & Bachrach,, D.G., (2000) ‘Organizationalcitizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empiricalliterature and suggestions for future research’, Journal of Management 26 (3),513-563.
' ~2 a+ @# L2 y. R. { d; ]. A4 w2 n* H9 {1 y
Podsakoff, P.M.,MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, N.P., & Lee, JY., (2003), ‘Common method biasesin behavioral research: A critical review of literature and recommendedremedies’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
% P$ i' }3 p# c) P/ {
; } T- O5 t7 _Podsakoff, P.M.& Organ, D.W. (1986), ‘Self-reports in organizational research: problemsand prospects’, Journal of Management, 12(4), 1986.
& u2 u7 k- V4 k4 e R; r+ | i& T: a. f
Schmitt, N.(1994), ‘Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement’, Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 15, 393-398
0 w2 N( x0 P1 X: A2 c7 k$ R, R- ]
Schwarz, Norbert(Feb. 1999), ‘Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers’, AmericanPsychologist, 54(2), 93-105.
/ I/ v+ O0 }( v2 V
. b& I+ h8 i+ X' {, y8 F! Z+ B
Spector, P. E.(Aug. 1987), ‘Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect andperceptions at work: Myth or significant problem?’ Journal of AppliedPsychology, 72(3), 438-443.
1 b, q: h- O' x5 V2 |) h
/ a$ {: t# W2 h. N$ j, D0 m6 S% USpector, P.E.(1994), ‘Using self-report questionnaires in OBresearch: a comment on the use of a controversial method’, Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 15, 385-392.
7 g R4 }, B7 Q, s- L9 i* q
% @7 ?* Q6 o3 ^ Spector, P. E. (April 2006), ‘Method variancein organizational research: truth or urban legend?’ Organizational ResearchMethods, 9(2), 221-232.
% x, ?! O" i& n# b
: ~- w: |5 u- K/ AWilliams, L.J.& Brown, B.K. (1994), ‘Method variance in organizational behavior and humanresources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesistesting’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 185-209.
! z- M, H; Y+ X
8 |! y. n) g+ y7 B! T3 GWilliams, L. J., Cote, J.A., & Buckley, M. R., (1989), ‘Lack of methodvariance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality of artifact?’Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462-468.
2 \6 B7 c: ?6 p. \% `2 g
作者: rwxld 时间: 2011-10-15 10:12
非常感谢分享，有很多没看过的。
作者: Kenneth 时间: 2011-10-15 16:29
香港時下年青人流行的“潮語”中形容詞有五級，分別是「好」、「勁」、「超」、「爆」、「喪」。 r$ h' L! I) V% F1 |5 h; @
比如喜歡中有：「好喜歡」、「勁喜歡」、「超喜歡」、「喜歡到爆」、「喪喜歡」。
; {- `* V4 @$ I7 a$ p! ]mythi1949的 common method variance 文章分享極為大公無私，應該歸入「喪」感謝等級！
作者: myth1949 时间: 2011-10-21 12:14
Kenneth 发表于 2011-10-15 16:29 
" m' j" G- o2 p5 G3 H# U+ W# J6 ^) @香港時下年青人流行的“潮語”中形容詞有五級，分別是「好」、「勁」、「超」、「爆」、「喪」。* n# {: o6 `0 K: D' P- [# A
比如喜歡 ...
! o- Z; O& T- G* J& v& P) j* j; s不敢当啊！ p3 A3 o9 F5 j* B9 U2 |9 K
5 R6 F: `$ [/ ]0 b. Q" a3 \若没有Kenny在大陆的奉献，我今生可能不会考虑写英文论文，相信大陆很多学生和青年教师也和我一样。
9 I4 z5 x. h' Q( v5 T3 R
3 E* ]6 v3 |" E- ?9 ?: ~虽然英文论文的写作需要过很多“关”，希望大家和我都可以坚持走下去。
| 欢迎光临 中人网 (http://bbs.chinahrd.net/) |
Powered by Discuz! X2.5 |