- 最后登录
- 2005-12-14
- 注册时间
- 2003-3-6
- 威望
- 0
- 金钱
- 3068
- 贡献
- 29
- 阅读权限
- 70
- 积分
- 3097
- 日志
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 帖子
- 649
- 主题
- 9
- 精华
- 0
- 好友
- 0
该用户从未签到 - 注册时间
- 2003-3-6
- 最后登录
- 2005-12-14
- 积分
- 3097
- 精华
- 0
- 主题
- 9
- 帖子
- 649
|
this phenomenon is very typical
! R" T* y+ T/ k6 [2 D. I
but the company also should check up their own action.7 X& b0 {6 j6 e `3 R9 X% ?% t
for example:
9 P3 b% |. T8 ^5 @2 Xsalary
, w6 z; b L6 qof course the candidate want more. but the company want to pay less. all is reasonable, so it is no need to criticized the candidate.* E' V% B7 G% {5 a2 }6 V6 ^
if the company think the people is worth to pay more, you should give the salary he expected, or you cann't retente him/her for a long time.
) t4 p7 x: A: ?3 J, nas the saying goes, the people we paid is more important than the people paid for us." }3 J4 X5 Z- y$ z* u4 m! @
if the company have not wake up to this, only want to give less salary, this company is not competitive and cann't stand for a long time. i have never seen a famous company is closehanded in salary.
( Q) w/ T! k p, Vibm is not, microsoft is not, hp is not.3 E: f; t" d2 b( K( x- S7 j
|
|