罗老师您好,我的IV,moderator1&2都是categorical的(1/0)Mediation 和DV是continuous的
5 O2 P# e! O) W3 ?! }# U" K2 N9 A7 E# Z) N
IV与两个moderator是manipulate的,mediator和DV是measure的。。。现在的结果有小小奇怪的地方是,iv到mediator以及3-way interaction (iv*moderator1*2)到mediator是不显著的. 但是,mediation report显示有作用 (具体请看结果)。; } N1 W; m, @; L! O S: t
请问这样的结果可以去分成八种情况(3-way)Interprate 么???
9 P* l" _9 b! {& ~3 n9 z1 ?. R* }2 j' f- h% B) @3 z
谢谢& n$ y( @9 n4 g
2 k/ [4 y- L6 E5 k+ ?0 TMy model results:: Z3 j4 f' m3 M5 |1 Y' b
" T: n6 W$ K2 J+ A
Run MATRIX procedure:
' c9 r: e( Y8 k& ]3 t# p5 A1 o9 I. [: g+ |' z9 k4 J
5 x4 }( B: D* s. @: O& u
************************************************************************** Model = 11 Y = mean_be X = similari M = mean_des W = method Z = culture
: F1 |, I6 X8 U4 ?8 G( N- h7 qSample size 197
/ k; P( I7 s3 POutcome: mean_des
* z8 J% ^3 J1 _" B$ P' b3 i" rModel Summary R R-sq F df1 df2 p .5534 .3063 11.9204 7.0000 189.0000 .0000 0 n, t7 @6 Q9 o
Model coeff se t p constant 5.9886 .1169 51.2177 .0000 similari .3486 .2339 1.4908 .1377 method 1.9783 .2339 8.4570 .0000 int_1 -.5295 .4678 -1.1318 .2591 culture .4626 .2338 1.9783 .0494 int_2 -.6915 .4677 -1.4785 .1409 int_3 -.3246 .4678 -.6939 .4886 int_4 1.2173 .9357 1.3009 .1949
$ v7 H* ^. F5 N0 |' lInteractions:
2 ]3 l1 v3 X) k& n. d int_1 similari X method int_2 similari X culture int_3 method X culture int_4 similari X method X culture 7 I) V& Q1 q3 }" D' _; L& [
************************************************************************** Outcome: mean_be . D Z2 d1 q+ L# @/ b
Model Summary R R-sq F df1 df2 p .2292 .0525 5.3762 2.0000 194.0000 .0053 ) {# f) {' T0 B& k7 @2 x
Model coeff se t p constant 3.7189 .4102 9.0661 .0000 mean_des .2136 .0652 3.2757 .0012 similari -.1017 .2516 -.4044 .6863
+ y0 i+ h' f4 e) R8 \******************** DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS*************************
( M5 F. B' P3 \4 Y2 U6 WDirect effect of X on Y Effect SE t p -.1017 .2516 -.4044 .6863
9 _, h9 Z" y% ~0 X. TConditional indirect effect(s) of X on Y at values of themoderator(s)
) i. l4 |% r! n/ A" j v. n% PMediator method culture Effect Boot SE BootLLCI BootULCI [url=]mean_des -.5127 -.5025 .2737 .1528 .0421 .6538[/url] mean_des -.5127 .4975 -.0073 .1136 -.2685 .2067 mean_des .4873 -.5025 .0299 .0923 -.1381 .2551 mean_des .4873 .4975 .0089 .0849 -.1580 .1887
6 g1 V% k% W$ U3 Z1 _2 {******************** ***YSIS NOTES AND WARNINGS*************************
6 K4 ?; q3 X) o. g: GNumber of bootstrap samples for bias corrected bootstrapconfidence intervals: 1000 0 P0 s9 e- R, l9 c2 u
Level of confidence for all confidence intervals inoutput: 95.00
! b9 g' m, J! O1 uNOTE: The following variables were mean centered prior to***ysis: similarimethod culture 4 Q4 m7 c1 b9 i
NOTE: Some cases were deleted due to missing data. The number of such cases was: 4
" [+ p3 u# l" ~6 E9 `6 \! f. b# c& r$ [7 [! R7 ~
% T8 o3 V8 e4 S: P2 z7 ?3 I2 v
- k& n% {. E7 R5 \: G
4 i4 z/ v; @; `+ R3 r9 O# t) W/ _7 H |