设为首页 登录 注册
首页 中人社区 中人博客
查看: 5300|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

同源误差(CMV)如何软件上实现??

[复制链接]

3

主题

4

听众

989

积分

秀才

Rank: 5Rank: 5

注册时间
2005-11-22
最后登录
2014-6-24
积分
989
精华
0
主题
3
帖子
73
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-7-5 08:52:07 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
如题,
在检验数据的同源误差程度时,有很多方法,如何用最简单的方法在软件上实现,具体步骤是什么??请教高人啊
WIN7    

3

主题

5

听众

281

积分

书生

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

注册时间
2010-7-12
最后登录
2017-6-11
积分
281
精华
0
主题
3
帖子
26
沙发
发表于 2012-7-6 10:45:08 |只看该作者
问这样的问题 要挨罗老师批评的
回复

使用道具 举报

69

主题

220

听众

2万

积分

中人网专家

Rank: 50Rank: 50Rank: 50Rank: 50Rank: 50

注册时间
2003-1-21
最后登录
2016-11-27
积分
29016
精华
0
主题
69
帖子
1438

2009年度勋章

板凳
发表于 2012-7-9 12:58:31 |只看该作者
qytaojh, 对不起, 我不教这个东西的。因为我自己不认同,而西方的期刊也大部分不会认同。再教的话,是误人子弟了。你可以自己看吧。
3 v( o) w; _0 ^# }; Q! N: F& N2 E5 s- R" ?
01. Spector, P.E., & Brannick, M.T. (2010). Common method issues: An introduction to the feature topic in organizational research methods. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 403-406.9 p- O, C8 f+ k( X. w3 H1 p

6 {; ?, R# c/ ?7 V9 O02. Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common Method Bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 456-476.
5 E9 h% p% I' A, X" \- R8 U
/ V9 A: \$ r: N. o) Q$ [03. Richardson, H.A., Simmering, M.J., & Sturman, M.C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762-800.' ?7 L& y5 |. x
8 h8 G& O  M: U
04. Lance, C.E., Dawson, B., Birkelbach, D., & Hoffman, B.J. (2010). Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3),435-455.. [) t6 c, |3 d) G7 J
' I( q0 _) }, L% B, H
05. Brannick, M.T., Chan, D., Conway, J.M., Lance, C.E., & Spector, P.E. (2010). What is method variance and how can we cope with it? A panel discussion. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 407-420.
1 l, x2 L* y2 K# _6 Q, O( q  g5 O& _( w9 G/ C
06. William, L.J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477-514.
) R- H4 g, Y0 ~, `9 Q
' C0 H1 ^8 I' }: B  G$ y07. Pace, V.L. (2010). Method variance from the perspectives of reviewers: Poorly understood problem or overemphasized complaint? Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 421-434.  J/ ~( Z5 e9 I9 {& Z8 F
2 P% \! |/ ^6 @8 K# V8 b2 g4 ?& [2 u
08. Spector, P.E. (2008). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221-232.  ^  _0 J5 e0 J+ M

- S8 s1 Q0 g/ X; ?+ i- O09. Malhotra, N.K., Kim, S.S., & Patil, A. (2006) Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865-1883.) q1 s8 b' n- r) n, @# Q; p: E

. \: {8 o' h+ l. m- b% j2 \% F10. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903./ o: ~' V8 Q% z2 z: V4 ~1 o' g
: M  n" C2 |7 d  C& ^
11.Vandenberg, R.J. (2006) Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Where, pray tell, did they get this idea? Organizational Research Methods,9(2), 194-201.0 b/ D/ R9 T- L! M4 L! e

  l, p# ~. W  _+ a! ~9 b12. Kline, T.J.B., Sulsky, L.M., & Rever-Moriyama, S.D. (2000). Common method variance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection. The Journal of Psychology, 134(4), 401-0421.7 J& I/ I8 s' E
7 R8 }" w' V, `( e+ A: Y0 v6 _- N% u
13. Bollen, K.A. & Paxton, P. (1998). Detection and determinants of bias in subjective measures. American Sociological Review, 63, 465-478.7 |( c: g: o' c1 |3 t3 V, ~

# N1 ^0 Z, b" A6 n/ P+ T' ^14. Boone, C. & Brabander, B. (1997). Self-reports and CEO locus of control research: A note. Organization Studies, 18(6), 949-971.0 e8 N$ @, v# m; O" S- p3 W
6 e) @" N* s( f, M' ?4 o$ n# p
15. Spector, P.E. (1994). Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(5), 385-392.- c4 a' {9 K/ p" n: ~+ `* _- X
1 z, ?( N# d) K
16. Williams, L.J., Cote, J.A. & Buckley, M.R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462-468.9 k$ v$ c, [# W
1 C, g! N1 }& }# E+ z" s( o
17. Spector, P.E. (1992). A consideration of the validity and meaning of self-report measures of job conditions. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 123-151.
: W* m) r' o( W2 y7 ~+ I1 [3 c9 @# h; Y  V7 d& c8 f9 F4 Z, c
18. Spector, P.E. (1987). Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 438-443.
- |: p2 N7 r9 a
! w  n, f# {/ T* [* @8 p19. Sharma, R., Yetton, P., & Crawford, J. (2009). Estimating the effect of common method variance: The method-method pair technique with an illustration from TAM research. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 473-490.
回复

使用道具 举报

无效楼层,该帖已经被删除