- 最后登录
- 2016-11-27
- 注册时间
- 2003-1-21
- 威望
- 250
- 金钱
- 16832
- 贡献
- 11934
- 阅读权限
- 255
- 积分
- 29016
- 日志
- 4
- 记录
- 0
- 帖子
- 1438
- 主题
- 69
- 精华
- 0
- 好友
- 380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b515/7b515a7b50477caa893113943e1db5eac35aed03" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b515/7b515a7b50477caa893113943e1db5eac35aed03" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b515/7b515a7b50477caa893113943e1db5eac35aed03" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ae57/7ae575322528d654e19debeb9ab15d4afae7cd71" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ae57/7ae575322528d654e19debeb9ab15d4afae7cd71" alt="Rank: 50"
- 注册时间
- 2003-1-21
- 最后登录
- 2016-11-27
- 积分
- 29016
- 精华
- 0
- 主题
- 69
- 帖子
- 1438
|
qytaojh, 对不起, 我不教这个东西的。因为我自己不认同,而西方的期刊也大部分不会认同。再教的话,是误人子弟了。你可以自己看吧。
0 U+ v+ a$ u8 L& {. V p/ x8 G/ ]1 m X6 Q: h" @8 c& J
01. Spector, P.E., & Brannick, M.T. (2010). Common method issues: An introduction to the feature topic in organizational research methods. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 403-406.5 _) _) G8 T2 W: e9 z" D6 |
, k- |) h7 P6 j2 e02. Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common Method Bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 456-476.
7 a0 R, \5 M5 p, D9 N. F0 C
4 j! H+ `. [2 p2 d7 X' p' j03. Richardson, H.A., Simmering, M.J., & Sturman, M.C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762-800.
3 H8 h" n, Y& j8 z0 X5 P3 @& e9 _8 Q. l1 p$ ^( V
04. Lance, C.E., Dawson, B., Birkelbach, D., & Hoffman, B.J. (2010). Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3),435-455.4 o* _: q5 R; u3 ]) l7 E
9 d8 C3 F9 o/ S. L" E6 i; T05. Brannick, M.T., Chan, D., Conway, J.M., Lance, C.E., & Spector, P.E. (2010). What is method variance and how can we cope with it? A panel discussion. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 407-420.1 |2 D; b9 V( x, ?$ U
! `# N/ ]: E) g: J3 k% ^
06. William, L.J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477-514.
0 w5 v: b6 R$ [, Z8 }4 D
- Z- Y; @4 N% h' i: Z07. Pace, V.L. (2010). Method variance from the perspectives of reviewers: Poorly understood problem or overemphasized complaint? Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 421-434.
8 x3 ^/ B4 k3 k, z: z0 U- L- B* {+ W: [4 Y2 _4 N
08. Spector, P.E. (2008). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221-232.
; B" T# J) @4 ~4 u" {% r
9 t" ^) ^1 J! B c09. Malhotra, N.K., Kim, S.S., & Patil, A. (2006) Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865-1883.
* I0 ] Z) r3 Y! i( a% F- r
$ y% V+ m/ ?* Q! d7 T' ^10. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
1 G; J" D$ G: R2 O
" a% H- |; T% Y/ D+ g6 R) a11.Vandenberg, R.J. (2006) Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Where, pray tell, did they get this idea? Organizational Research Methods,9(2), 194-201.
5 [0 n" c3 {5 S7 i+ m4 m! ~$ b# }1 ~
12. Kline, T.J.B., Sulsky, L.M., & Rever-Moriyama, S.D. (2000). Common method variance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection. The Journal of Psychology, 134(4), 401-0421.
4 O1 P; ?) H- V% p; j5 {
& y/ E* x R ~: a/ U13. Bollen, K.A. & Paxton, P. (1998). Detection and determinants of bias in subjective measures. American Sociological Review, 63, 465-478.
# w8 K5 _0 B7 b# ]
0 @3 O- _# d6 k: w7 U, f% G9 Y14. Boone, C. & Brabander, B. (1997). Self-reports and CEO locus of control research: A note. Organization Studies, 18(6), 949-971./ V8 n' x7 {' R
- G. G `6 ]4 \2 V; T/ [: |
15. Spector, P.E. (1994). Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(5), 385-392.4 K( j$ I3 s' x2 d5 f. z: \( i
7 T1 {) j2 W7 ^( H16. Williams, L.J., Cote, J.A. & Buckley, M.R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462-468. O# V3 }3 }7 f. E, D
) w7 W% j5 N# U$ ?' ~& ^1 }+ `17. Spector, P.E. (1992). A consideration of the validity and meaning of self-report measures of job conditions. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 123-151., u6 O- `' W3 q- S5 z" Z/ J( t
I- F9 m1 ]5 S9 G- h* \! I18. Spector, P.E. (1987). Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 438-443.6 B2 g9 j8 G9 ?$ ~/ R0 @0 D
( d+ U5 |8 d i1 h0 f
19. Sharma, R., Yetton, P., & Crawford, J. (2009). Estimating the effect of common method variance: The method-method pair technique with an illustration from TAM research. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 473-490. |
|