同源误差（CMV）如何软件上实现？？

qytaojh

如题，

在检验数据的同源误差程度时，有很多方法，如何用最简单的方法在软件上实现，具体步骤是什么？？请教高人啊

WIN7

问这样的问题 要挨罗老师批评的

Kenneth

qytaojh, 对不起， 我不教这个东西的。因为我自己不认同，而西方的期刊也大部分不会认同。再教的话，是误人子弟了。你可以自己看吧。

01. Spector, P.E., & Brannick, M.T. (2010). Common method issues: An introduction to the feature topic in organizational research methods. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 403-406.

& U) [" a9 x3 d/ V% e  h02. Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common Method Bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 456-476.

03. Richardson, H.A., Simmering, M.J., & Sturman, M.C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762-800.
# G& k% Z9 F0 N% Y: R
04. Lance, C.E., Dawson, B., Birkelbach, D., & Hoffman, B.J. (2010). Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3),435-455.
$ K- h) Y9 P9 S+ l% F+ E) S
05. Brannick, M.T., Chan, D., Conway, J.M., Lance, C.E., & Spector, P.E. (2010). What is method variance and how can we cope with it? A panel discussion. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 407-420.
/ l& s- z6 F* Q. Y' w5 T
06. William, L.J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477-514.
% d) ~1 z& ]4 O! V
* P% l6 |" j8 A4 b& m* L& k07. Pace, V.L. (2010). Method variance from the perspectives of reviewers: Poorly understood problem or overemphasized complaint? Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 421-434.

/ L/ Z" V0 L+ |: p- g1 c08. Spector, P.E. (2008). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221-232.
6 G* G* `, _1 J: M& G2 y
09. Malhotra, N.K., Kim, S.S., & Patil, A. (2006) Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865-1883.

10. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
( y5 G( }" @: f2 t" {
11.Vandenberg, R.J. (2006) Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Where, pray tell, did they get this idea? Organizational Research Methods,9(2), 194-201.

' E* a7 U" Y! f7 H8 m12. Kline, T.J.B., Sulsky, L.M., & Rever-Moriyama, S.D. (2000). Common method variance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection. The Journal of Psychology, 134(4), 401-0421.

0 C1 `4 O, Z' O+ f13. Bollen, K.A. & Paxton, P. (1998). Detection and determinants of bias in subjective measures. American Sociological Review, 63, 465-478.

: t' g& N4 B3 b14. Boone, C. & Brabander, B. (1997). Self-reports and CEO locus of control research: A note. Organization Studies, 18(6), 949-971.

1 H1 X) O3 T* G4 t; Y" T* N15. Spector, P.E. (1994). Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(5), 385-392.
* Y/ s# {9 H4 _- b; e% e
1 m/ s& r* }) L& p7 V) b% `16. Williams, L.J., Cote, J.A. & Buckley, M.R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462-468.

17. Spector, P.E. (1992). A consideration of the validity and meaning of self-report measures of job conditions. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 123-151.
% q# U: m3 b3 A- C5 B0 a  @* A' N
: E0 ?8 r% M: A6 P5 L  \18. Spector, P.E. (1987). Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 438-443.

19. Sharma, R., Yetton, P., & Crawford, J. (2009). Estimating the effect of common method variance: The method-method pair technique with an illustration from TAM research. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 473-490.