- 最后登录
- 2016-11-27
- 注册时间
- 2003-1-21
- 威望
- 250
- 金钱
- 16832
- 贡献
- 11934
- 阅读权限
- 255
- 积分
- 29016
- 日志
- 4
- 记录
- 0
- 帖子
- 1438
- 主题
- 69
- 精华
- 0
- 好友
- 380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b515/7b515a7b50477caa893113943e1db5eac35aed03" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b515/7b515a7b50477caa893113943e1db5eac35aed03" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b515/7b515a7b50477caa893113943e1db5eac35aed03" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ae57/7ae575322528d654e19debeb9ab15d4afae7cd71" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ae57/7ae575322528d654e19debeb9ab15d4afae7cd71" alt="Rank: 50"
- 注册时间
- 2003-1-21
- 最后登录
- 2016-11-27
- 积分
- 29016
- 精华
- 0
- 主题
- 69
- 帖子
- 1438
|
yusu, LISREL 容许你做 multiple sampling comparison (多样本比较)的。 我用下面的例子来解释:
; U! f, {- o o4 s; z1 r6 k9 N+ C0 g: l" O6 T+ p u
Group: Academic reading and writing, Grades 5 and 7* c& `9 R: R+ V+ {% F6 v; E: t
Observed Variables: read5 write5 read7 write7
$ T$ w# i* d% \Covariance Matrix:
, d: P! q0 m* L8 N) P% e281.349
8 m. a$ A z% Q' f5 J/ A184.219 182.8214 v8 i" M$ A2 T1 M3 D
216.739 171.699 283.289% X$ w( b$ H- N, Z- l
198.376 153.201 208.837 246.069' V A7 y H+ i1 z2 P' I' w' C2 X
Sample Size: 373& S: _7 a& C8 ]7 ?7 P
Latent Variable: verbal5 verbal7. q) m1 [8 t+ q0 W
Relationships:, B# q! n4 _; i
read5 = verbal5
8 E- w* M( U; t+ J3 f! l5 G) @9 \( m write5 = verbal58 M& q4 u6 N1 V: u E t* q! W
read7 = verbal7( s' m$ l* }0 `3 F0 b
write7 =verbal7/ n4 a% ?/ y6 Q; n# ]
+ G! l! Q! f8 q6 {7 \Group: Non-academic reading and writing, Grades 5 and 7
7 Q% L; E1 I" G& x( A3 [5 b) ZCovariance Matrix:
" C# q3 |! _( L; b, e' [174.485) j! G7 r4 i* C" u
134.468 161.8693 u- ^3 ^& p# z8 j9 e6 N7 ]
129.840 118.836 228.4490 p- G% E4 J& T: W0 P8 y
102.194 97.767 136.058 180.4600 n9 b5 w9 @% f5 T. c+ g
Sample size: 249# ?& F( E; R. I! W' D3 k: @
Relationships:
, x k& t/ q! h) M! C read5 = verbal5" V, E2 t/ b3 O- z
write5 = verbal57 A1 Y, I; Q" c+ E: r& ?, C
End of Problem
8 [: x7 a \6 |' h
* a! ]# |- V; [- b. l) U你发现这个CFA中,在第一个样本里我们猜四条路径:
8 t6 \# _6 J. U+ a read5 = verbal5
) [$ [8 m$ V; G write5 = verbal5" W" d5 \4 R# f3 d7 o% [
read7 = verbal7
$ l+ [7 ~% H# E- q1 e write7 =verbal7
1 r# T/ o% [' @5 [' R但是在第二个样本中,我们只猜两条:3 p& i5 B# U% }! f/ N
read5 = verbal53 ?/ s/ r9 p1 V, J2 t* F# W' o- G
write5 = verbal5
% ]: u3 u! j: L所以, read7 -> verbal7 和 write7 -> verbal7 在第二个样本中,我们指定它的估计要和样本一是一样的。这样的模型有一个模型的卡方。7 h8 k! Y. M9 t9 d4 s! `
+ X Y( G1 b, J6 C然后,我们再做一次。这次我们在两个样本都让它自由的估计四条路径。我们得到另外一个卡方。两个卡方的差是否显著,就解答了 read7 -> verbal7 和 write7 -> verbal7 是否 “可以” 在两个样本一样的问题了。' T; k) `) C1 a' }
|
|