- 最后登录
- 2016-11-27
- 注册时间
- 2003-1-21
- 威望
- 250
- 金钱
- 16832
- 贡献
- 11934
- 阅读权限
- 255
- 积分
- 29016
- 日志
- 4
- 记录
- 0
- 帖子
- 1438
- 主题
- 69
- 精华
- 0
- 好友
- 380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b515/7b515a7b50477caa893113943e1db5eac35aed03" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b515/7b515a7b50477caa893113943e1db5eac35aed03" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b515/7b515a7b50477caa893113943e1db5eac35aed03" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ae57/7ae575322528d654e19debeb9ab15d4afae7cd71" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ae57/7ae575322528d654e19debeb9ab15d4afae7cd71" alt="Rank: 50"
- 注册时间
- 2003-1-21
- 最后登录
- 2016-11-27
- 积分
- 29016
- 精华
- 0
- 主题
- 69
- 帖子
- 1438
|
yusu, LISREL 容许你做 multiple sampling comparison (多样本比较)的。 我用下面的例子来解释:
* j7 r) F2 B/ ^6 v/ |( t+ R4 O0 I) p; @4 y* E% j+ a
Group: Academic reading and writing, Grades 5 and 7
3 w l a f+ |* W3 ?: ^1 n$ o2 ~Observed Variables: read5 write5 read7 write7( F3 m8 [8 T. T0 t& B
Covariance Matrix:$ K& o; S! g: v3 Q% k
281.349( ]& J8 J! i" \ K- D- q k
184.219 182.821, R, [/ E1 Y) z7 h* L$ W
216.739 171.699 283.289# _* g6 H) C: n8 F( W5 N& A
198.376 153.201 208.837 246.069
, M+ L' q* \: h5 c- Y) F. k% V! D3 fSample Size: 373' H( n; }# I% i' f
Latent Variable: verbal5 verbal7" X( P0 k6 j2 z' R; ]4 K* m
Relationships:* ]9 l1 x2 N) E
read5 = verbal5
; R0 |3 A$ h. ~/ l& H write5 = verbal5
; L( Y4 B, i* T, W1 J# ^) F read7 = verbal7
$ Y1 N! ^2 J. {& a0 i+ q write7 =verbal7
+ e' O$ i: a E6 }3 \8 |, b7 n6 b6 o% K( ~' p J; B
Group: Non-academic reading and writing, Grades 5 and 7
6 ?( g4 c7 B: @: GCovariance Matrix:
, ~, ?0 I8 a2 s! H$ a174.485$ g2 M' |8 q. J. V6 A; d
134.468 161.8697 B5 d; t4 o6 E# x1 Z9 k' L
129.840 118.836 228.449 G) L# `: z: u8 \
102.194 97.767 136.058 180.460
: o; ~+ Z6 q; X9 z; h" gSample size: 2495 U' L+ @# Z* X, y5 k2 ]
Relationships:$ b* m) q- Y/ l- l$ ~* Y
read5 = verbal58 Q& D: A! g; V5 C" s1 t6 ^
write5 = verbal5
" W/ k* q8 Y$ cEnd of Problem) T) X- v( w7 _/ ~ Q: _& a. ?
0 a" s% F; k7 ` p& t8 ^* `你发现这个CFA中,在第一个样本里我们猜四条路径:
7 x4 K* v/ ^" r# ]- I$ j read5 = verbal5% S8 U6 f/ j1 }- l. W$ y& v, w
write5 = verbal5
. S4 @* |# ~7 @$ l1 b; G read7 = verbal76 a% ?& e# M: S: x- \1 z
write7 =verbal7
6 A' M0 T: @+ d% D R* R5 g但是在第二个样本中,我们只猜两条:
: a: M+ N& q, B2 {: m l read5 = verbal5
. U3 S8 }: Z$ R8 w: ^ write5 = verbal5
' N l2 N- K+ L& s所以, read7 -> verbal7 和 write7 -> verbal7 在第二个样本中,我们指定它的估计要和样本一是一样的。这样的模型有一个模型的卡方。4 ^2 C- R0 [7 U6 ^2 p1 ]
6 [+ Y/ Y0 j1 T$ w1 O% ~9 R
然后,我们再做一次。这次我们在两个样本都让它自由的估计四条路径。我们得到另外一个卡方。两个卡方的差是否显著,就解答了 read7 -> verbal7 和 write7 -> verbal7 是否 “可以” 在两个样本一样的问题了。4 y" N2 P% ?0 l3 S5 r, o. f( D) W
|
|