罗老师您好,我的IV,moderator1&2都是categorical的(1/0)Mediation 和DV是continuous的
. @$ r8 U% [2 X+ V3 ]# \+ [% r# X" o: u9 ? [- I$ C# ]. p4 T
IV与两个moderator是manipulate的,mediator和DV是measure的。。。现在的结果有小小奇怪的地方是,iv到mediator以及3-way interaction (iv*moderator1*2)到mediator是不显著的. 但是,mediation report显示有作用 (具体请看结果)。
4 T; x; c4 i" b* b: Y; c请问这样的结果可以去分成八种情况(3-way)Interprate 么???
H# X, a+ w$ R, _/ W3 P7 y5 Y( n8 i! {# S' }1 k R, Z5 f
谢谢
" q* \- {( a9 c- `
1 l& w2 d7 F( W- FMy model results:
8 n0 f. \' @5 x: \4 U. }! K0 N6 S, D* d
Run MATRIX procedure: ~; d" j, m) w; E4 \5 Q
. x9 ?, _$ ]! V/ p/ [6 T& C; c# h2 q" q5 K) q2 D
************************************************************************** Model = 11 Y = mean_be X = similari M = mean_des W = method Z = culture
3 z# u' n/ J& ySample size 197
4 L1 P6 Q- Y! U6 Q/ YOutcome: mean_des
& N# a2 j+ x6 Y2 D$ w6 ]7 T) qModel Summary R R-sq F df1 df2 p .5534 .3063 11.9204 7.0000 189.0000 .0000
( C0 r5 L) h" Z0 y8 h; i# K3 DModel coeff se t p constant 5.9886 .1169 51.2177 .0000 similari .3486 .2339 1.4908 .1377 method 1.9783 .2339 8.4570 .0000 int_1 -.5295 .4678 -1.1318 .2591 culture .4626 .2338 1.9783 .0494 int_2 -.6915 .4677 -1.4785 .1409 int_3 -.3246 .4678 -.6939 .4886 int_4 1.2173 .9357 1.3009 .1949
+ P0 ?# Y9 C0 r9 gInteractions:
9 H! m5 H+ O- M6 y' V: b# k; L1 A6 e int_1 similari X method int_2 similari X culture int_3 method X culture int_4 similari X method X culture . k- O2 k( t, j1 }* M1 n
************************************************************************** Outcome: mean_be
2 ?# q8 V: n7 m7 p, CModel Summary R R-sq F df1 df2 p .2292 .0525 5.3762 2.0000 194.0000 .0053 ' x' }" V* N9 ^9 C9 a
Model coeff se t p constant 3.7189 .4102 9.0661 .0000 mean_des .2136 .0652 3.2757 .0012 similari -.1017 .2516 -.4044 .6863 5 z. H- Q+ s! i
******************** DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS*************************
/ H0 ], m4 F7 q2 u HDirect effect of X on Y Effect SE t p -.1017 .2516 -.4044 .6863
! P+ E+ m4 m- {$ h2 x4 l& FConditional indirect effect(s) of X on Y at values of themoderator(s) $ l# ]8 y5 E q0 r* W R! g
Mediator method culture Effect Boot SE BootLLCI BootULCI [url=]mean_des -.5127 -.5025 .2737 .1528 .0421 .6538[/url] mean_des -.5127 .4975 -.0073 .1136 -.2685 .2067 mean_des .4873 -.5025 .0299 .0923 -.1381 .2551 mean_des .4873 .4975 .0089 .0849 -.1580 .1887
7 ]. O# W" g! K4 _8 Y& d# B# T* {/ Y# D1 \******************** ***YSIS NOTES AND WARNINGS*************************
9 _: K# ]% r4 h3 t8 ]& \' S) DNumber of bootstrap samples for bias corrected bootstrapconfidence intervals: 1000
* [6 q: I9 Z. v' ^& a9 _- w7 \Level of confidence for all confidence intervals inoutput: 95.00 ?1 H/ p. j; _! A! I
NOTE: The following variables were mean centered prior to***ysis: similarimethod culture
8 g/ e0 _$ g. w, g+ XNOTE: Some cases were deleted due to missing data. The number of such cases was: 4 # g; f, }% q! i6 A2 [
2 c- N! d5 ]5 d
) g0 v) W& ?' n% c2 f' ]9 E- d
* L9 W6 _0 i2 q7 ?8 E
; r$ e5 n# R P' e7 J2 y; S |