- 最后登录
- 2016-11-27
- 注册时间
- 2003-1-21
- 威望
- 250
- 金钱
- 16832
- 贡献
- 11934
- 阅读权限
- 255
- 积分
- 29016
- 日志
- 4
- 记录
- 0
- 帖子
- 1438
- 主题
- 69
- 精华
- 0
- 好友
- 380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b515/7b515a7b50477caa893113943e1db5eac35aed03" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b515/7b515a7b50477caa893113943e1db5eac35aed03" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b515/7b515a7b50477caa893113943e1db5eac35aed03" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ae57/7ae575322528d654e19debeb9ab15d4afae7cd71" alt="Rank: 50" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ae57/7ae575322528d654e19debeb9ab15d4afae7cd71" alt="Rank: 50"
- 注册时间
- 2003-1-21
- 最后登录
- 2016-11-27
- 积分
- 29016
- 精华
- 0
- 主题
- 69
- 帖子
- 1438
|
yusu, LISREL 容许你做 multiple sampling comparison (多样本比较)的。 我用下面的例子来解释:( b* H G5 Z% M, V, {; I
, }8 B+ m, \; Z$ L) [Group: Academic reading and writing, Grades 5 and 7
$ P- {0 C3 w$ B! lObserved Variables: read5 write5 read7 write7
4 c# z0 {/ f1 \5 R/ _8 V% NCovariance Matrix:
3 R4 ^- {- r8 R281.349
; o# U& u2 B! `# D/ a* O184.219 182.821# A; s% d6 G) O
216.739 171.699 283.289
* P" d3 e. Z. f# f4 q/ T198.376 153.201 208.837 246.069
2 o. g: V$ Q$ w7 w7 b rSample Size: 373
$ ]* @0 ^" j" B: B; j# t( |+ B" |Latent Variable: verbal5 verbal7
! o7 m1 |& f' W URelationships:$ Q( b( Y/ t1 U
read5 = verbal52 h; l) n2 f b
write5 = verbal5
6 A' o( O2 P4 C% d read7 = verbal7
( ?3 Z& T2 B# ?2 r h: b; z& w. B8 B write7 =verbal71 H2 o! ]* h# a" |* z+ {1 c$ Y, \
$ b5 e* J) I( q- Q# n( }Group: Non-academic reading and writing, Grades 5 and 7 9 m1 ` ]/ Y) M1 F6 G' f. b
Covariance Matrix:
" i( f+ R& w* l! H' y& u) X174.485
- n* d- K; a7 K4 r6 ?) k* [134.468 161.869
4 j, R9 S% X( T2 k$ m' m129.840 118.836 228.449% j/ c% i) N4 v; j& `! ]) q
102.194 97.767 136.058 180.460. k( X3 |: A2 ^, d, O. e
Sample size: 249
& I7 n, x! ^$ `9 u* L8 T2 {* iRelationships:- T7 z- v# u* {, _
read5 = verbal5, z) _# s7 D' F; O, v
write5 = verbal5
" o0 U; _: m! i2 CEnd of Problem% Z1 f# }7 u( `# e' E
& T" g4 E: i, }' c) l: i你发现这个CFA中,在第一个样本里我们猜四条路径:
* P8 J* a" Y" h8 ~/ r% f read5 = verbal5% C( _7 b- v2 }7 ]* R3 p, Z
write5 = verbal54 Y- W$ Z* p1 v U$ r, I
read7 = verbal7
% Q5 G2 F# i& t2 ^* Y8 B write7 =verbal7
4 w5 D" \ q* ~7 v6 W5 _: R但是在第二个样本中,我们只猜两条:
: b' H1 W( K8 G9 }6 D, p read5 = verbal59 w3 ]4 {5 Y' w% F ]- y4 K
write5 = verbal5* F7 H$ ]/ ]: X7 z
所以, read7 -> verbal7 和 write7 -> verbal7 在第二个样本中,我们指定它的估计要和样本一是一样的。这样的模型有一个模型的卡方。
9 g6 U# k% E9 I" \7 n3 v* G0 }% R' e; r* `
然后,我们再做一次。这次我们在两个样本都让它自由的估计四条路径。我们得到另外一个卡方。两个卡方的差是否显著,就解答了 read7 -> verbal7 和 write7 -> verbal7 是否 “可以” 在两个样本一样的问题了。
( l! [! h3 `" f* | |
|