- 最后登录
- 2014-9-15
- 注册时间
- 2013-11-14
- 威望
- 0
- 金钱
- 65
- 贡献
- 40
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 积分
- 105
- 日志
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 帖子
- 17
- 主题
- 4
- 精华
- 0
- 好友
- 0
  
- 注册时间
- 2013-11-14
- 最后登录
- 2014-9-15
- 积分
- 105
- 精华
- 0
- 主题
- 4
- 帖子
- 17
|
罗老师好,想请教您一个问题:
/ @( w! C/ w7 ^- u8 m
: M6 G* `# ]- a5 J- z" d |$ _我在Leadership Quaterly上面看到一篇文章,是用MSEM测试的 一个2-1-1-2 sequential mediation. ) \) N! l' |% ]) |( N
( C4 M' [# [/ }& @! QNohe, C., Michaelis, B., Menges, J. I., Zhang, Z., & Sonntag, K. (2013). Charisma and organizational change: A multilevel study of perceived charisma, commitment to change, and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 378-389.% B! ?) F; p& q' A3 o* \0 T
9 y7 `/ \, `- m% p在处理cross-level mediation的时侯,作者) E9 K' i6 r- ?9 Z. s
“decompose the variance of a variable into its latent within-unit component (within-team variance) and a latent between-unit component (between-team variance; Lüdtke et al., 2008; Muthén & Asparouhov, 2009). Relationships between these variance components can be modeled independently at each level through the specification of structural and measurement models.”[p.383]$ c. h7 M8 O: F4 j
+ H' M {& B& ^按照这个方法,我用Mplus把level 1的variable 分别在Level 1和Level 2作为latent variable 建Model (两个level 1的variable,每个都由7个item来衡量),然后只用Level 2的coefficients来计算the indirect effect of sequential mediation. 1 ^" |5 j- x5 P$ k: |
8 @0 o' E3 j2 }# {6 F" E虽然Mplus给出了coefficient的estimation和significance level,但是model整体“nonidentified”,然后Mplus report “THE NONIDENTIFICATION IS MOST LIKELY DUE TO HAVING MORE PARAMETERS THAN THE NUMBER OF CLUSTERS. REDUCE THE NUMBER OF PARAMETERS.”
8 Y& L2 H m0 B% h& d8 M! r; H9 I$ f X+ n& q& i" s1 _
我想这大概是主要因为每个latent variable的measure item比较多,可是group number只有39个的原因(虽然individual level sample 有1800多个)。
/ `: K; s, U9 y) R: {/ X. h9 Z8 n: j5 A
我试了另外一个model,不是用latent variable,而是用直接的aggregated variable分别在Level 1(mean of the 7 measure items) 和Level 2 (group average of the level 1 variable)参与模型运算。还是只看所有Level 2的coefficients来计算2-1-1-2的indirect sequential mediation。 Mplus就没有任何warning了。
: Q* Z$ u# `7 `3 _, r' f, `9 T4 ?& T- t! v' }0 ?; K. \' m
我想请问罗老师,如果我在limitation里面承认model有不完美的地方,我可以用我自己试的方法,不用latent variable,而是直接在Level 1和Level 2用aggregated value来计算一个2-1-1-2的模型么?
$ i$ k$ _! B+ u" d
, Q+ \5 ?/ O1 t, y" ~* B真诚希望得到您的指点!: P) {* ]( r: `5 [: ]% g, _2 K: @
% i9 g& @7 V ~, X* G; H: ]3 P3 @谢谢先!
% W3 z/ n. }& B/ z9 G( ]5 H" O# F0 ~; J. v9 ^& }
" S l/ l1 }; t
% m7 @7 Y$ ^# P
% k/ a ^+ j( B7 c/ h+ H. B" V, V0 M( a' e6 } W5 Q* J
2 I2 I1 U! S" k' j
|
|