- 最后登录
- 2014-9-15
- 注册时间
- 2013-11-14
- 威望
- 0
- 金钱
- 65
- 贡献
- 40
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 积分
- 105
- 日志
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 帖子
- 17
- 主题
- 4
- 精华
- 0
- 好友
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2013-11-14
- 最后登录
- 2014-9-15
- 积分
- 105
- 精华
- 0
- 主题
- 4
- 帖子
- 17
|
罗老师好,想请教您一个问题:4 G8 }# H6 b) u8 e
. o, ~$ w, Y0 b6 t6 K
我在Leadership Quaterly上面看到一篇文章,是用MSEM测试的 一个2-1-1-2 sequential mediation.
$ V* \! N. P9 \( ^ E! u) x8 i {! s
$ N1 _) R" I* y8 wNohe, C., Michaelis, B., Menges, J. I., Zhang, Z., & Sonntag, K. (2013). Charisma and organizational change: A multilevel study of perceived charisma, commitment to change, and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 378-389.
3 Q/ s# |6 g& m3 F( C/ r4 C
: } F. w7 @5 @9 m* X在处理cross-level mediation的时侯,作者
2 u! k2 U+ }3 B) A4 K“decompose the variance of a variable into its latent within-unit component (within-team variance) and a latent between-unit component (between-team variance; Lüdtke et al., 2008; Muthén & Asparouhov, 2009). Relationships between these variance components can be modeled independently at each level through the specification of structural and measurement models.”[p.383]
$ Q$ T+ z& r- p0 K( }; H4 R9 Z
) C& M' v5 x/ q0 Z按照这个方法,我用Mplus把level 1的variable 分别在Level 1和Level 2作为latent variable 建Model (两个level 1的variable,每个都由7个item来衡量),然后只用Level 2的coefficients来计算the indirect effect of sequential mediation. 0 B9 o6 c+ I) S- K1 u
& R9 q! [7 n3 v5 j; v虽然Mplus给出了coefficient的estimation和significance level,但是model整体“nonidentified”,然后Mplus report “THE NONIDENTIFICATION IS MOST LIKELY DUE TO HAVING MORE PARAMETERS THAN THE NUMBER OF CLUSTERS. REDUCE THE NUMBER OF PARAMETERS.”
\2 B& z7 I: R @' Q$ B
t- O1 ]- r% O/ z! q' c我想这大概是主要因为每个latent variable的measure item比较多,可是group number只有39个的原因(虽然individual level sample 有1800多个)。1 W& |0 p( f/ G+ O. H6 t
0 t) T. E! T2 Y6 [% T+ E我试了另外一个model,不是用latent variable,而是用直接的aggregated variable分别在Level 1(mean of the 7 measure items) 和Level 2 (group average of the level 1 variable)参与模型运算。还是只看所有Level 2的coefficients来计算2-1-1-2的indirect sequential mediation。 Mplus就没有任何warning了。
) }/ M; K7 P( [8 Y* g$ m9 f- ~% E" e7 D% j4 a( i
我想请问罗老师,如果我在limitation里面承认model有不完美的地方,我可以用我自己试的方法,不用latent variable,而是直接在Level 1和Level 2用aggregated value来计算一个2-1-1-2的模型么? . X9 j0 z4 _! h
& y: u( Y3 N# B$ [
真诚希望得到您的指点!2 G) a6 Q. h) Y, h% E
5 N6 f4 o! |+ s3 x
谢谢先!0 g. g0 d/ N' A! d0 w
$ {8 q/ X1 u5 K+ r4 K7 X* v" h
/ O5 P0 f% {% G' b. j: [: ` K# T0 J5 `- y
+ E; U: ]- q3 q# Y# _7 U, y! b
# p$ N% M( o& B
0 a3 V& Y& h; h |
|