创业与战略（企业家精神）小组（Entrepreneurship and Strategy）

cbl223

This Interest Group focuses on entrepreneurial behavior both in new ventures and established organizations. Its purpose is to help create useful knowledge on effective entrepreneurial strategies. Some of the important questions that it seeks to address include: How can we strengthen the theorizing on entrepreneurial activity? How does a focus on innovation and entrepreneurship differ from other theories on competitive advantage? What are the appropriate research methods for a scientific study of the entrepreneurial process? What is the role of strategy in a new venture firm and how does it differ from that in an established firm?

来自Strategic management society网站

6 i2 W9 T5 x6 ?, B8 k( e! q! Q

heavensea

我一个建议，这个小组的中文名字改为创业与战略小组。

cbl223

呵呵，这是我们中国的研究者要克服的又一障碍，本来我们对研究的科学精神就不是很精通，还要在同一个英文词不同的汉语翻译上打架。heavensea，请问这一领域的前沿研究有哪些？可否推荐引荐几篇文献？

heavensea

由于领域太过宽泛，文献我无法求全了。只能提供几个刊物，例如：
9 V% Y  g' [3 }% Y: x; y6 u' E6 `SMS在2007年出版的Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal（SEJ，战略创业期刊），这是Michael. Hitt和Jay. Barney牵头弄起来的。有个创业学者跟我说，这是做战略的学者在蚕食创业研究领域，呵呵！
比较传统的关注创业的期刊就是，Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice （ETP）和Journal of Business Venturing（JBV）了，当然，AMJ和AMR也有部分创业研究文献，不过最新的研究个人认为还是SEJ,　ＪＢＶ和ＥＴＰ出的比较快。
% f( v. V% q+ ]9 v/ i
目前制度创业似乎比较热门，列出我收录的几篇该领域的文献：
) P" H. o; m0 u3 e$ UTracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. 2010. Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science: 1090-1522.
Puffer, S. M., McCarthy, D. J., & Boisot, M. 2010. Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: The Impact of Formal Institutional Voids. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3): 441-467.
Nasra, R., & Dacin, M. T. 2010. Institutional Arrangements and International Entrepreneurship: The State as Institutional Entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3): 583-609.
9 ?# j" I& Q+ g2 i3 @; {( wLim, D. S. K., Morse, E. A., Mitchell, R. K., & Seawright, K. K. 2010. Institutional environment and entrepreneurial cognitions: A comparative business systems perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3): 491-516.
  e7 b% z% V9 @- k  E: H5 IBruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. 2010. Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3): 421-440.
Moore, C. B., Bell, R. G., & Filatotchev, I. 2010. Institutions and Foreign IPO Firms: The Effects of "Home" and "Host" Country Institutions on Performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3): 469-490.
Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2010. Rapid Institutional Shifts and the Co-evolution of Entrepreneurial Firms in Transition Economies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3): 531-554.
1 C3 C; w3 Z6 G" N  m, N7 jReay, T. 2009. Family-Business Meta-Identity, Institutional Pressures, and Ability to Respond to Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6): 1265-1270.
: C+ a8 X  m5 l: G! x7 ^Manolova, T. S., Eunni, R. V., & Gyoshev, B. S. 2008. Institutional Environments for Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Emerging Economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1): 203-218.
5 J3 l8 w4 U/ F$ A3 nAidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. 2008. Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6): 656-672.
Townsend, D. M., & Hart, T. A. 2008. Perceived Institutional Ambiguity and the Choice of Organizational Form in Social Entrepreneurial Ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4): 685-700.
$ I8 S9 ]$ a+ T6 k3 @! P2 jAhlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Yeh, K. S. 2008. Private firms in China: Building legitimacy in an emerging economy. Journal of World Business, 43(4): 385-399.
  l# U1 d3 m. u" m" `! O7 S1 _# N" eScott, W. R. 2007. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
6 f* |0 ^6 u4 O: a  m+ f. [5 `. nAhlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2006. Venture Capital in Emerging Economies: Networks and Institutional Change. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2): 299-320.
Cumming, D. J. 2005. Agency costs, institutions, learning, and taxation in venture capital contracting. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5): 573-622.
! H  l& F; S  {& }Bruton, G. D., Fried, V. H., & Manigart, S. 2005. Institutional Influences on the Worldwide Expansion of Venture Capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(6): 737-760.
& M! R* S% F( [  z9 mAhlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2002. An institutional perspective on the role culture in shaping strategic actions by technology-focused entrepreneurial firms in China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4): 53-69.
# T6 t; `7 q4 o+ \9 HDacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. 2002. Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 43-56.
Peng, M. W., & Shekshnia, S. V. 2001. How entrepreneurs create wealth in transition economies. The Academy of Management Executive, 15(1): 95-110.
Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. 2001. Learning from successful local private firms in china: Establishing legitimacy. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4): 72-83.
, I  Q4 U, Y3 P1 mBusenitz, L. W., Gómez, C., & Spencer, J. W. 2000. Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 994-1003.
3 R3 k# N0 u6 l% z9 U/ U( N* I
0 B( a0 k8 _+ Q1 O