设为首页 登录 注册
首页 中人社区 中人博客
查看: 6306|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

研究方法线上

[复制链接]

69

主题

220

听众

2万

积分

中人网专家

Rank: 50Rank: 50Rank: 50Rank: 50Rank: 50

注册时间
2003-1-21
最后登录
2016-11-27
积分
29016
精华
0
主题
69
帖子
1438

2009年度勋章

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-5-3 15:32:01 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
今天在网上找文章时,恰巧看见一所台湾大学的网站。它们把不同的管理学问卷研究方法的领域的重要的文章都写出来了(其实是他们两个教研究方法的课程的大纲)。我稍为看了一下,很多经典的文章都在里面了。当然我没有详细的看,不保证所有的文章都是好的。不过作为一个阅读的清单,不失为一个好的开始。网站是:/ r* S. u% c5 _
http://spaces.isu.edu.tw/~RMonline/website/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=52&Itemid=66: S/ x+ _) W4 h0 {) ?( {7 P7 T4 T
+ O, r6 g% B3 p' H7 ?' f
因为是公开网站,资料应该是公开的。同时我怕国内的同学不容易上到台湾的网站,所以剪贴了出来给大家参考。不过,不仅这不是我的东西,所以请大家作为“参考”好了。& A3 S3 y0 G5 L' l) y" C

* Z1 |, q3 z3 `+ \+ r" @- QKenny0 A8 Y( `1 p5 ~
; q& O+ H2 B1 z5 l% V( W4 O3 Y
研究方法线上! h. ~. ^" I7 w
+ H- _  S5 Y- q: ^
ResearchMethodology I ) S) j1 x( R0 |" [! v) R+ a1 x
OverviewTextbooks
9 Z# T) q2 D( g9 ~Issue1: Introduction: Science, Knowledge, and Theory
; }( R6 G1 P, K5 @9 q7 C3 XIssue2: Theory and Hypothesis Development
% C% W0 u& j1 g$ k1 {( wIssue3: Construct and Dimensionality: Multidimensional construct
# P& d2 n3 {1 a, [% y( J7 W& V) WIssue4: Measurement: Reliability and Validity
/ k+ w' w# F- V+ O1 wIssue5: Measurement: Scale Development . N4 t* C" o. D$ T$ Q, k5 M
Issue6: Scale Development for Chinese Management Research $ c1 M) y- Q: H' }/ Z
Issue7: Constructs and Hypothesis Testing 8 D; n  e( `) Q; B! m7 M3 L! `
Issue8: Sampling, Field studies and Surveys $ w7 C) `$ \9 a# [  _( S7 z
Issue9: Experiments and Quasi-Experiments 6 f4 y- R4 \( B9 N/ D5 i
Issue10: Case Studies and Qualitative Research
  E1 D$ Z, H& A& w3 H" MIssue11: Statistical Analysis and Inference0 P9 Z& n9 G9 ^
Issue12: Basic concept of mediation and moderation
! ^' S0 @& w$ K  S. z2 \Issue13: Testing mediating effects
& F8 a* P8 U& O* V" B: |/ k2 i" Z3 C+ y7 AIssue14: Testing moderating effects % ^+ Q$ P  h6 ^+ F
Issue15: Testing mediated moderation and moderated mediation
; u4 A  \9 W# IIssue16: Reliability and Construct Validation
- c( i3 H1 K6 jIssue17: Common Method Variance
- n5 x) n* G$ Y2 X7 k! Z) EIssue18: Data Non-independence
5 G4 J( [: n. a, sIssue19: The Culture Factor (Cross-cultural and Indigenous Research) ) L: W! P  v* m$ \3 m5 e
Issue20: Structural Equation Modeling- q  N* b5 J1 o# h" G) ]  H
% z- j9 `  e) K5 L
Major Textbooks:  r* N& Q+ Z' h7 \+ R4 _( }1 d4 M+ D( t+ n
Kerlinger, F.N. & Lee, H.B. (2000). Foundations of BehavioralResearch. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.( X5 |4 a9 v3 k' v) i- H
Schwab, D.P. (2005). Research Methods for Organizational Studies. (2ndEd.) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum. [Amazon] [Google Book]! Q" _9 I' z3 ~& |( |
Klein, K.J.& Kozlowski, S.W. (eds.). (2000). Multilevel Theory,Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and NewDirections. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Amazon]
* G9 h& l! K5 W8 O) ^Supplementary Books:. A4 d6 D4 k- c7 U
Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1998). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Science. Mahwah, NJ: LawrenceEarlbaum.[Amazon]
5 @; f; c$ s+ u; ]* ~0 PCook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design andAnalysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. [Amazon]% N6 F% h9 D/ u0 k9 d$ ^
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. 1998. MultivariateData Analysis. 5th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJrentice-Hall. [Amazon]+ Q7 J3 r( o( k. L# Q5 `
Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. 1991. Measurement, Design, andAnalysis: An Integrated Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
: M3 N' g1 h- V9 E1 v4 f/ @# [Rogelberg, S.G. (ed.) 2002. Handbook of Research Methodsin Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
( J; K/ n* J* P  C3 eJournal of Management. 1997. Special Issue on Hierarchical LinearModels. 23(6).
$ \# H( D6 ]; Q  rAcademy of Management Review. 1999. Special topic forum on multileveltheory building. 24(2).
' ^+ _; L( U$ d9 @Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2001. Special issue on multilevelmodels. 36(2).
$ y- L% [) x/ V/ j, cLeadership Quarterly. 2002. Special issue: Bench marking multilevelmethods in leadership. 13(1).
/ _2 H2 \7 r8 G' N3 N% B. zAcademy of Management Journal. 2007. Special forum on multilevelresearch. 50,6.
6 ?9 p! a* J" V1 [1 g% wKreft, I. & de Leeuw, J. 1998. Introducing Multilevel Modeling.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.* Y: b3 B" u; x* d; d9 P
Raudenbush, S.W. & Bryk, A. S. 2002. Hierarchical LinearModels in Social and Behavioral Research: Application and Data AnalysisMethods. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  n% F7 v. r+ L1 RRoberts, K. H., Hulin, C. L., & Rousseau, D. M. 1978.Developing an interdisciplinary science of organizations. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Z5 U& F/ i# tRoberts, K. H., & Burstein, K. (eds.) 1980. Issuesin aggregation: New directions for methodology of social and behavior science (vol.6). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.4 B5 a3 w+ X* [2 g! m
陳曉萍徐淑英樊景立鄭伯壎2008),組織與管理研究的實證方法,台北:華泰文化。
7 Q) j# D1 h4 \1 y" r9 l5 ]5 A, J4 B. V
Issue 1: Introduction: Science, Knowledge, and Theory
* k/ ]* V1 D$ f) W( mK & L: Chapter 14 c. v7 K0 g$ c: m% j8 y4 O
01-01.  Burrell, G.& Morgan, G. 1979. Assumptions about the nature of Science. SociologicalParadigms and Organizational Analysis. 1-9. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann EducationalBooks., z& ?9 W. @( ~. |1 l8 P; ~
01-02.  Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroyinggood management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education,4(1): 75-91.' x8 U- E9 `: y! n2 F' e4 Y  c
01-03.  Gioia, D.A. & Pitre, E. 1990. Multiparadigm perspectives on theorybuilding. Academy of Management Review, 15(4): 584-602.
4 y0 z$ \) f$ G. v7 s9 U/ }- D- p01-04.  Orlitzky, M. 2002. Book review: Research Methods forOrganizational Studies by D. P. Schwab. Organizational Research Methods,5(1): 126-128.& ]0 F$ h1 l8 [. k) O- x/ q$ T
01-05.  Wright, T. A., & Wright, V. P. 1999. Ethicalresponsibility and the organizational researcher: A committed-to-participantresearch perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior,20(7): 1107-1112.
5 [$ v' n$ f! m& d01-06.  Porter, L. 1996. Forty years of organization studies:Reflections from a micro perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly,41: 262-269.
* p; D* u6 [7 E! W" `01-07.  陳曉萍等(2008):Ch1: 科學過程與研究設計。) C. @9 |- I$ J- D6 E2 e$ c2 {8 E8 l
01-08.  陳曉萍等(2008):Ch2: 研究的起點:提問。
3 [- I! F; E# Q9 m# W4 }! J" [+ _0 Z. q! \2 V# |/ Y
Issue 2: Theory and Hypothesis Development
) u; M- s; `% k3 @7 h, ]) S02-01.  Schwab: Chapters 1 and 2
$ q- k) ~4 [7 p: s& E7 x02-02.  Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Somecriteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review,14: 496-515.0 T' h0 _7 A3 _" x: X
02-03.  Bartunek, J. M., Rynes, S. L., & Ireland, R. D. 2006. What makes a management researchinteresting and why does it matter? Academy of Management Journal,49(1): 9-15." k, `' p& ~9 v8 ^) ]6 X: Q
02-04.  Bergeron D. M. 2007. The potential paradox of organizationcitizenship behavior: good citizens at what cost? Academy of ManagementReview, 32 (4):1078–1095.
5 o! K( v" T9 g# i. l* X$ L02-05.  Davis, M. S. 1971. That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenologyof sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of Social Science,1(2): 309-344.) k" }! `. e3 I( Z" h* i) J
02-06.  Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. 1998. Trust and distrust: new relationships andrealities. Academy of Management Review, 23: 438-458.
3 L! E+ I( ~% Y: X7 N0 o6 u- y02-07.  Morris, J. A. & Feldman, D. C. 1996. The dimensions, antecedents, andconsequences of emotional labor. Academy of Management Review, 21(4):986-1010.
: O# s' q+ |* B( V02-08.  Podsakoff, P. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1987). Research methodology inorganizational studies. Journal of Management, 13, 419-441.1 P2 u5 g6 p7 V% P4 g- F
02-09.  Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. A. (1993). The motivational effects ofcharismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4,577–594.% X3 [. v& K8 f: w6 H" H
02-10.  Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. 1995. What theory is not. AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 40: 371-384.; Y. j1 h3 o% {0 t# L+ U  t- K+ A6 t
02-11.  Weick, K.E. 1995. What theory is not, theorizing is. AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 40: 385-390.! E& z! K, _0 T: t' G/ Z, J2 ]# D# _
02-12.  Whetten, D. A. 1989. What constitutes a theoreticalcontribution. Academy of Management Review, 14: 490-495.
0 A* q" R* w9 o5 l02-13.  陳曉萍等(2008):Ch3: 管理研究中的理論建構。" k$ ?% A& d2 s$ |3 a, u; n
02-14.  Whetten, D. A., Felin, T., & King, B. G. (2009). The practice of theory borrowing inorganizational studies: Current issues and future directs. Journal ofManagement, 35(3), 537-563.
  a* `& n2 E" i* b. L/ M( z! j  a2 K) v/ u+ ~7 ~3 ?
Issue 3: Construct and Dimensionality: Multidimensional construct [Discussion]1 o* k) [' O5 B1 e5 W: K6 l9 X
03-01.  Edwards, J. R. (2001). Multidimensional constructs inorganizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework.Organizational Research Methods, 4(2): 144-192.- G; e- f' R# E# Y9 {% M+ K
03-02.  Law, K. S., & Wong, C. S. (1999). Multidimensional constructs instructural equation analysis: An illustration using the job perception and jobsatisfaction constructs. Journal of Management, 25(2): 143-160.
, [) m8 @3 J, _03-03.  Law, K. S., Wong, C. S., & Mobley, W. H. (1998). Toward a taxonomy of multidimensionalconstructs. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 741-755.0 D6 f8 O; c. \' t& [1 t0 V
03-04.  LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality oforganizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1): 52-65.
7 t4 M- W9 c7 C6 [" K+ ^' L: a03-05.  Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K.E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptiveperformance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4): 612-624.# Y$ T! i, d5 u% ^' c8 a
03-06.  Wong, C. S., Law, K. S., & Huang, G. H. (2008). On the importance of conductingconstruct-level analysis for multidimensional constructs in theory developmentand testing. Journal of Management, 34 (5): 744-764.7 e1 v! Y* G" r
03-07.  陳曉萍等(2008):ch12
5 z, y1 p3 w. C! E, d5 A1 j6 _
$ E2 R# d) d7 C0 r1 w8 E+ j4 V3 BIssue 4: Measurement: Reliability and Validity [Discussion]
( k2 A5 O% `3 }2 P% }**Schwab: Chapters 3, 4, 8' b/ c) d2 Z1 V6 _1 R
K & L: Chapters 26, 27, 28.9 U4 J. d6 p5 y# O
04-01.  Negy, S. M. 2002. Using a single-item approach to measure facetjob satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75:77-86.. I4 F; Q* w& F' {8 C
04-02.  **Schmitt, N. W., & Klimoski, R. J. 1991. Determining the quality of ourmeasures. In Research Methods in Human Resources Management, (pp.88-114). Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Co.& g' z, ?% u" U9 c
04-03.  Austin, J. T., Boyle, K. A., & Lualhati, J. C. 1998.Statistical conclusion validity for organizational science researchers: Areview. Organizational Research Methods, 1: 164-208.5 Y3 _* l; A6 B
04-04.  Schriesheim, C. A., Cogliser, C. C., Scandura, T. A., Lankau,M. J., & Powers, K. J. 1999. An empirical comparison of approaches forquantitatively assessing the content adequacy of paper-and-pencil instruments. OrganizationalResearch Methods, 2: 140-156.* x9 J( P! u1 a5 d5 T) ^$ m/ ?- ]
04-05.  Wanous, J. P., & Huddy M. J. 2001. Single-item reliability:A replication and extension. Organizational Research Methods, 4(4):361-375.
4 A; p1 v) k! j* G' m; U& k/ b9 g04-06.  Lim, B. C., & Ployhart, R. E. 2006. Assessing theconvergent and discriminant validity of Goldberg's international personalityitem pool: A multitrait-multimethod examination. Organizational ResearchMethods, 9(1): 29-54.
0 }3 @! X- ?6 w; X' M04-07.  Cole, M. S., Bedeian, A. G., & Feild, H. S. 2006. The measurementequivalence of web-based and paper-and-pencil measures of transformationalleadership: A multinational test. Organizational Research Methods, 9(3):339-368.  ?, r- N8 X/ W! C# r0 p' n" P9 `
04-08.  Meade, A.W., & Eby, L. T. 2007. Using indices of groupagreement in multilevel construct validation. Organizational ResearchMethods, 10: 75-96.+ f, E# M1 s9 O1 A
. H( s2 A0 @) M8 I4 M
Issue 5: Measurement: Scale Development1 @3 v( E; p1 W' @
**Schwab: Chapter 4+ f2 k. n/ n' G& g
05-01.  **Hinkin, T. R. 1998. A brief tutorial on the development ofmeasures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods,1: 104-121." L1 i1 d5 z# y2 Y
05-02.  DeVellis, R. F. 1991. Scale Development: Theory andApplication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.) w: M3 K; p9 L. K' N
05-03.  Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. 2000. A Review andSynthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, andRecommendations for Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods,3: 4-70.
/ p2 [8 o$ L* D% ^) c05-04.  **Farh, J. L., Zhong, C. B. & Organ, D. W. 2004. Organizational citizenship behavior inthe People’s Republic of China, Organization Science, 15: 241-253.! W6 j9 g7 R$ z* D) u* q
05-05.  Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. 1999. Measuring impression management inorganizations: A scale development based on the Jones and Pittman taxnonomy, OrganizationalResearch Methods, 2: 141-160.; H* b! D! i* b: H  w
05-06.  **陳曉萍等(2008):ch11; R$ p9 d7 |& r% ^  }: M

7 k% l! M* h( p2 ]7 EIssue 6: Scale Development for Chinese Management Research+ F& r/ w( K+ j% X* U, W. M
MOR, special issue: 2006, 2(3).
5 \" E( M% M7 C* \* r- g( X0 z# f) P3 i5 `3 @( k' y
Issue 7: Constructs and Hypothesis Testing9 t2 o) D6 ^8 `# M
K & L: Chapters 2, 3, and 5
& x( X. c8 |9 M9 B+ p**Schwab: Chapter 13
" k/ d6 J3 F- D07-01.  **Higgins, M. C. & Kram, K. E. 2001. Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: Adevelopmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 6(2):264-288.7 q2 I  J- h' n3 u! }
07-02.  Law, K. S. & Wong, C. 1999. Multidimensional constructs in structuralequation analysis: An illustration using the job perception and jobsatisfaction constructs. Journal of Management. 25(2):143-160.0 w# j  c- j5 {" l: q
07-03.  **Cortina, J. M., & Folger, R. G. 1998. When is it acceptable to accept a nullhypothesis: No way, Jose? Organizational Research Methods, 1: 334-350.
* |3 c# T% h9 w07-04.  **陳曉萍等(2008):ch5( ?# s+ X: H' d/ u6 S  @
07-05.  Williams, L. J., Edwards, J. R., & Vandenberg, R. J. 2001. Recent advances in causal modelingmethods for organizational and management research. Journal of Management,29(6): 903-936.
/ y, y2 z$ l; G! `! Z- m" V9 `: v/ [% V" s! H, b$ r0 l; A, d
Issue 8: Sampling, Field studies and Surveys
" b5 i7 u2 ?  u3 |, L# @/ G**Schwab: Chapters 5 and 7
6 Q: N" m# f: A9 B6 g% x5 l4 VK & L: Chapters 8, 18, 19, 20, 25 and 29
# I3 j% }" S- W) T08-01.  Gordon, M. E., Slade, L. A., & Schmitt, N. 1986. The “science of the sophomore” revisited:From conjecture to empiricism. Academy of Management Review, 11(1):191-207.; n7 g8 {0 b8 r
08-02.  Gordon, M. E., Slade, L. A., & Schmitt, N. 1987. Student guinea pigs: Porcine predictorsand particularistic phenomena. Academy of Management Review, 12(1):160-163.& e/ D! C6 [% s  F
08-03.  Greenberg, J. 1987. The college sophomore as guinea pig:Setting the record straight. Academy of Management Review, 12(1):157-159.2 M$ o' \7 c& k( i1 _
08-04.  Mollica, K. A. & Dewitt, R. L. 2000. When others retireearly: What about me? Academy of Management Journal, 43(6): 1068-1075.
. \) w2 |6 B# X7 x08-05.  **Tsai, W. C. & Huang, I. M. 2002. Mechanisms linkingemployee affective delivery and customer behavioral intentions, Journal ofApplied Psychology, 87: 1001-1008., h2 i4 W: u: Q/ b0 ]  Y
08-06.  Saks, A. M. 1995. Longitudinal field investigation of themoderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy on the relationship betweentraining and new comer adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80:211-225.
7 E5 g1 ]. [; t7 i+ H- e0 \6 ^% @8 F0 z08-07.  Werner, S., Praxedes, M., & Kim, H.G. 2007. The reportingof nonresponse analysis in survey research. Organizational Research Methods,10: 287-295." J4 e9 _- W; W/ M7 D( p/ ]  I
08-08.  **陳曉萍等(2008):ch8: R1 _+ Z5 r# X1 t( ^
08-09.  Austin, J. T., Scherbaum, C. A., & Mahlman, R. A.(2002). History of research methods in industrial and organizationalpsychology: Measurement, design, analysis. In S. G. Rogelberg(Ed.), Handbook of research methods inindustrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1-33). Oxford, UK: Blackwell., F! a. z+ k# e& U# T, \
08-10.  Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodologicalfit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1155-1179.
  ~' W; ~' g$ L08-11.  Stone-Romero, E. F., Weaver, A. E., & Glenar, J. L. (1995).Trends in research design and data analytic strategies in organizationalresearch. Journal of Management, 21, 141-157.
( p3 ?" f2 @7 b6 |  `" w08-12.  Werner, S., Praxedes, M., & Kim, H. (2007). The reportingof nonresponse analyses in survey research. Organizational Research Methods,10: 287-295.. ^4 ?/ n% f, f8 U
' K$ K' s! w) V; U7 K1 Y! U4 {
Issue 9: Experiments and Quasi-Experiments
8 N5 K' N5 C" w+ d$ I( o**Schwab: Chapter 69 w+ j( r) Q' i% I+ k
K & L: Chapters 24 and 22
6 W  ]9 ?7 o7 p( o  g09-01.  Cook, T. D. & Shadish, W. R. 1994. Social experiments:Some developments over the past fifteen years. Annual Review of Psychology,45: 545-580.
5 b6 j" p) ^5 r9 Y+ P6 U09-02.  **Dvir, T., Eden, D., & Banjo, M.L. 1995. Self-fulfillingprophecy and gender: Can women be Pygmalion and Galatea? Journal of AppliedPsychology, 80(2): 153-170.
5 Q% E5 |( G* M( \/ [/ J8 U09-03.  Audia, P. G., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. 2000. Theparadox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistencefollowing radical environment change. Academy of Management Journal,43(5): 837-853.
9 K5 B; t' x8 z0 f3 {  P( U- K09-04.  Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. 2002. Impact of transformational leadership onfollower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy ofManagement Journal, 45(4): 735-744.
1 `: n+ m7 p: Q# b09-05.  Greenberg, J. & Tomlinson, E. C. 2004. Situated experimentsin organizations: Transplanting the lab to the field. Journal of Management,30(5): 703-724.. r$ ]* M0 F! w) [1 r7 C$ S
09-06.  **陳曉萍等(2008):ch6, ch7.5 I  L" C1 T' z1 R! j, w

! M3 _( \% x" U; P; R7 TIssue 10: Case Studies and Qualitative Research4 m1 |% S2 G3 V$ ]  U8 O
10-01.  Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case studyresearch. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532-550.5 j5 u: _4 ~% t
10-02.  Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions inhigh-velocity environment. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3):543-576.9 s8 ~# L" _/ `" B4 i) W
10-03.  Morgan, G. & Smircich, L. 1980. The case forQualitative research. Academy of Management Review, 5(4): 491-500.$ M2 z, X3 n# `3 p
10-04.  Barley, S. R. 1996. Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographicevidence for bringing work into organization studies. Administrative ScienceQuarterley, 41(3): 404-441.5 v0 Z, ^$ i# W3 j7 n
10-05.  Elsbach, K. D. & Kramer, R.M. 2003. Assessing creativity inHollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativityjudgments. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3): 283-301.5 Z7 g9 G9 w) s% y- r
10-06.  King, N. 2004. Using interviews in organizational research. InC. Cassell and G. Symon (eds.) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods inOrganizational Research. 11-22. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.3 l8 I7 G9 ]9 d- m9 m
10-07.  Murnighan, J. K., & Conlon, D. E. 1991. The dynamics ofintense work groups: A study of British String Quartets, AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 36: 165-186.
3 a- i9 p9 I3 A6 ?7 ?& E10-08.  Silvester, J. 2004. Attributional coding. In C. Cassell and G.Symon (eds.) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in OrganizationalResearch. 228-241. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8 R3 s( Q5 J9 k5 W2 ~' q; [5 Y10-09.  陳曉萍等(2008):ch10+ T! v, L6 M* ]9 A& V( M
10-10.  Fendt, J., & Sachs, W. (2008). Grounded theory method inmanagement research: Users' perspectives. Organizational Research Methods, 11,430-455.3 Y+ B* ?* ~7 @' A4 C9 W

# x0 V, M( ?: \1 \$ d* q+ FIssue 11: Statistical Analysis and Inference [Discussion]
  t" O. l  D" d; u1 m**Schwab: Chapters 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13
" H6 S% x* y/ \4 |- V" V% ~K & L: Chapters 9& S9 Y2 U+ E! L& L' G1 v( g- ?
11-01.  Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whosetime has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5),746-759.$ }3 _' g$ W& P$ K# S
11-02.  Kirk, R. E. (2001). Promoting good statistical practices: Somesuggestions. Educational and Psychological measurement, 61(2),213-218.) q7 T4 _# a4 c! \
11-03.  McFarland, L.A., Ryan, A. M., & Kriska, S. D. (2003).Impression management use and effectiveness across assessment methods. Journalof Management, 29(5), 641-661.
2 I' H9 y& D: t3 s6 w+ x# y11-04.  Rauniar, R. & Shah, S. (2002). Statistical significance vs.practical (meaningful or clinical or biological) significance for academic andnon-academic research. Decision Sciences Institute 2002 Annual MeetingProceedings, 2469-2472.
) y( B/ O) S) D$ Z11-05.  LaHuis, D.M., & Avis, J. M. (2007). Using multilevel randomcoefficient modeling to investigate rater effects in performance ratings. OrganizationalResearch Methods, 10, 97-107.
7 q& h6 b7 J# @; Z9 y- Q11-06.  Cashen, L., & Geiger, S. W. (2004). Statistical power andthe testing of null hypotheses: A review of contemporary management researchand recommendations for future studies. Organizational Research Methods, 7,151-167./ B- ?& w3 }& e. W4 t

) b; R3 v/ U* |, `Issue 12: Basic concept of mediation and moderation: i0 [, [! X3 A4 _
**Schwab: Chapters 11 and 195 _3 x( }. T* l' k" r
K & L: Chapters 33 and 34
9 r0 ?- S! P! P; B12-01.  **Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variabledistinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, andstatistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6): 1173-1182." l6 ~  z8 ~/ F8 w/ x9 \& u
12-02.  James, L. R. & Brett, J. M. 1984. Meidators,moderators, and test for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology,69(2): 307-321.  L8 N9 s' Q1 ]% I
12-03.  Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. 2006. Clarifying conditionsand decision points for mediational type inferences in Organizational Behavior.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 1031-1056.
. G' t) m1 T0 O0 h12-04.  MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. 2007.Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58: 593-614.
1 t/ L  s6 n/ p7 ~9 m  O: e; o+ g12-05.  **陳曉萍等(2008):ch14- J7 A0 S, o6 B( H9 C" y' L' J1 X
& |& B- g! L0 I2 R. |- F8 ?, X. ^
Issue 13: Testing mediating effects4 ~6 a3 c2 W- F0 f' C/ z( B$ ^
13-01.  Mathieu, J. E., DeShon, R. P., & Bergh, D. D. 2008.Mediational inferences in organizational research: Then, now, and beyond. OrganizationalResearch Methods, 11(2): 203-223.4 K' N/ h7 r  u7 ]- W, G7 N! w
13-02.  Kenny, D. A. 2008. Reflections on mediation. OrganizationalResearch Methods, 11(2): 353-358.7 a/ Z' i+ P5 Z% x; X" X" Q
13-03.  James, L. 2008. On the path to mediation. OrganizationalResearch Methods, 11(2): 359-363.8 E7 z: A$ x9 A7 c2 y
13-04.  MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G.,& Sheets, V. 2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and otherintervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1): 83-104.
" a' `0 j2 O& l$ P13-05.  Pituch, K. A., Whittaker, T. A., & Stapleton, L. M. 2005. Acomparison of methods to test for mediation in multisite experiments. MultivariateBehavioral Research, 40: 1-24.7 Y8 W. n- j' r, d+ D4 ?
13-06.  Alwin, D. F., & Hauser, R. M. 1975. The decomposition ofeffects in path analysis. American Sociological Review, 40(1): 37-47.
9 f1 S1 `6 K, u/ a13-07.  Bobko, P., & Rieck, A. 1980. Large sample estimators forstandard errors of functions of correlation coefficients. AppliedPsychological Measurement, 4: 385-398.( U9 _5 n/ B9 k$ F0 x( C
13-08.  Bollen, K. A. 1987. Total direct and indirect effects instructural equation models. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology(pp. 37-69). Washington DC: American Sociological Association.
( e+ c/ V+ E! \  u13-09.  Freedman, L. S., & Schatzkin, A. 1992. Sample size forstudying intermediate endpoints within intervention trials of observationalstudies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 136: 1148-1159.' y  K4 H" ~. e
13-10.  Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1981. Process Analysis: Estimating mediationin treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5: 602-619.0 @% d) [$ Z- ?, s
13-11.  MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. 1993. Estimating mediatedeffects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17: 144-158.; e, c4 v& G& A5 x' x& u
13-12.  MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. 2000.Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. PreventionScience, 1: 173-181.( l: E& b- l5 q6 B
13-13.  MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. 1995. Asimulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate BehavioralResearch, 30: 41-62.
+ {, ]" B5 c% G13-14.  Sobel, M. E. 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals forindirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.) SociologicalMethodology 1982, (pp. 290-312). Washington, DC: American SociologicalAssociation.
$ w' F& `, p: q4 R: q0 u% _13-15.  Sobel, M. E. 1990. Effect analysis and causation in linearstructural equation models. Psychometrika, 55: 495-515.: Z1 B' \/ E  ^  u7 h$ z2 V3 r: H
13-16.  Hoyle, R. H., & Kenny, D. A. 1999.  Statistical power andtests of mediation.  In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies forsmall sample research. Newbury Park: Sage.8 ^  f4 i+ m) N
13-17.  MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. 1948. On a distinctionbetween hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. PsychologicalReview, 55: 95-107.+ z4 U: y2 ^7 d) X  e# k( W8 P
13-18.  MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. 2007.Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58: 593-614.
6 d; d% j+ B% ?+ C; L; T) ]! C7 ]13-19.  MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G.,& Sheets, V. 2002. A comparison of methods to test the significance ofthe mediated effect. Psychological Methods, 7: 83-104., M- S" T4 ~# |+ L# Y1 J9 G0 R
13-20.  MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J.H. 1995. A simulation study of mediated effect measures. MultivariateBehavioral Research, 30: 41-62.
5 Z! m: x1 i6 X$ t! ~13-21.  Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. 2002. Mediation inexperimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. PsychologicalMethods, 7: 422-445.
. n# O: r7 c8 p' @13-22.  Smith, E. 1982.  Beliefs, attributions, and evaluations:Nonhierarchical models of mediation in social cognition. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 43: 248-259.. L- b" h! {7 n7 c8 Y
13-23.  Sobel, M. E. 1982.  Asymptotic confidence intervalsfor indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.),Sociological Methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). Washington DC: AmericanSociological Association.
- z2 X9 X4 ?" H8 A8 P; V* A) ?
. ^" S8 y( i) F, W Issue 14: Testing moderating effects
& t# D' @8 ]7 z  \+ l14-01.  Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A.T. 2002. Time, teams, task performance: Changing effects of surface-anddeep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of management Journal,45(2): 1029-1045.5 `0 A& a' l' o1 `9 D
14-02.  Cronbach, L. J. 1987. Statistical tests for moderatorvariables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin,102(3): 414-417.
% O6 p* E# v) U8 U4 b14-03.  Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Atwater, L. E., & James, L. R. 2002. Neutralizing substitutes for leadershiptheory: Leadership effects and common methods bias. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 87(3): 454-464.& g& {* o5 a4 H+ K& s
14-04.  Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. 2006. Clarifying conditionsand decision points for mediational type inferences in Organizational Behavior.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 1031-1056.
1 i' u8 d' ^7 n& x3 e4 p" B8 R14-05.  Stone E. F. & Hollenbeck, J. R. 1989. Clarifyingcontroversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderatorvariables: Empirical evidence and related matters. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 74(1): 3-10.
5 @# \3 y, ^- r* p9 O, K14-06.  Villa, J. R., Howell, J. P., Dorfman, P. W., Daniel, D. L.2003. Problems with detecting moderators in leadership research using moderatedmultiple regression. Leadership Quarterly, 14(1): 3-23.+ l" n* }5 f' n
$ Y  h2 Z" f( l8 G
Issue 15: Testing mediated moderation and moderated mediation* r) B; E6 h! U/ e
Schwab: Chapters 11 and 19) \  p4 q+ p" j- }
K & L: Chapters 33 and 34! g/ _0 K4 G, }. @$ p: g( n7 l
15-01.  Edwards, J. R. & Lambert, L. S. 2007. Methods forintegrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework usingmoderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1): 1-22.
' x; l) _' z7 s  B15-02.  Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. 2006.Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation inmultilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods,11: 142-163.
4 t+ w' x# I8 [$ h# ]; g) P$ I15-03.  Edwards, J. R., & Lambert L. S. 2007. Methods forintegrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework usingmoderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12: 1-22.' R+ ]0 W! [3 G
15-04.  Kenny, D. A., Korchmaros, J. D., & Bolger,N. 2003. Lower level mediation in multilevel models. PsychologicalMethods, 8: 115-128.
) Q- P5 p$ @" P; v5 P2 p, [$ X15-05.  Kraemer H. C., Wilson G. T., Fairburn C. G., & Agras W.S. 2002.  Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomizedclinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59: 877-883.8 f1 J; p7 X9 e; U% E
15-06.  Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). Whenmoderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 89: 852-863.$ u# \9 o: H7 g+ O
15-07.  Krull, J. L. & MacKinnon, D. P. 1999. Multilevelmediation modeling in group-based intervention studies. EvaluationReview, 23: 418-444.
: y2 c4 [; g# \" C
/ I! v& V% ?: f; X  \Issue 16: Reliability and Construct Validation
; R" W  b( H) Y( y2 n! u" m) a( pSchwab: Chapters 14 and 17
$ Y" X- A  _: o* N- ZK & L: Chapter 28% A$ B1 k7 J" a5 F- \! j
16-01.  Bagozzi, R. P., Edwards, J. R. 1998. A General Approach for RepresentingConstructs in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods,1: 45-87.# V- e- T  {. i. q( a8 U! [% Z" Y
16-02.  Austin, J. T., Boyle, K. A., & Lualhati, J. C. 1998.Statistical Conclusion Validity for Organizational Science Research: A Review. OrganizationalResearch Methods, 1: 164-208.
" m( p# ?0 S$ [. x/ R5 A9 s) l16-03.  Campbell, D. T. & Fiske, D. W. 1959. Convergent anddivergent validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. PsychologicalBulletin, 56:81-105.
9 k/ y( a3 b" _5 w5 q16-04.  Colquitt, J. A. 2001. On the dimensionality oforganizational justice: a construct validation of a measure, Journal ofApplied Psychology, 86:386-400.3 l* ^6 E8 S% h7 e" I( B2 t
16-05.  Cronbach, L.J. & Meehl, P. E. 1955. Construct validityin psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 32(4): 281-302.8 f! M3 ?( ?( J5 O/ @" w7 x' X
16-06.  Schriesheim, C. A., & Powers, K. J. 1993. Improvingconstruct measurement in management research: Comments and a quantitativeapproach for assessing the theoretical content adequacy of paper-and-pencilsurvey-type instruments. Journal of Management, 19(2): 385-417.
4 N6 ]; T$ s. ?8 L" H* T16-07.  Schwab, D. P. 1980. Construct validity in organizationalbehavior. In Staw B. M. & Cummings L. L. (Eds.) Research inOrganizational Behavior, 2, Greenwich, Con: JAI Press Inc. 3-43.
' I0 G/ ]1 D3 G2 b- Z! _& V. g7 U5 P4 @$ o* g
Issue 17: Common Method Variance& k  a: m+ D8 M- L8 M7 A, J* u
**Schwab: Chapters 16, 17, 18 and 20
& f$ s; @3 t! q& l17-01.  **彭台光, 高月慈, 林鉦棽 2006. 管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報23(1): 77-98.
' s. A. l9 E$ T2 J& g$ z17-02.  Doty, D. H. &Glick, W. H. 1998. Common methods bias: Does common methods variance reallybias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1(4): 374-406.
2 c, }" j# `- z17-03.  Goffin, R. D. & Gellatly, I. R. 2001. A multi-raterassessment of organizational commitment: Are self-report measures biased? Journalof Organizational Behavior, 22: 437-451.
0 N# r. S9 B2 t17-04.  Kemery, E. R. & Dunlap, W. P. 1986. Partialling factorscores does not control method variance: A reply to Podsakoff and Todor.Journal of Management, 12(4): 525-530.
3 O2 r. g/ k7 C7 W17-05.  Podsakoff, P. M. & MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff,N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review ofthe literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology,88: 879-903.3 j1 S/ o; }, [
17-06.  Podsakoff, P. M. & Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational researchroblems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4): 531-544.5 b2 f4 C: Y3 g" \/ J+ z( ?
17-07.  Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. 1996. Measurement error in psychologicalresearch: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1:199-223." c' {' _3 g) H6 U4 i
17-08.  Spector, P. E. & Brannick, M. T. 1995). The nature andeffects of method variance in organizational research. International Reviewof international and organizational Psychology, 10: 249-274.# H: z% o8 P  k, J0 J* a4 {
17-09.  Spector, P. E. 2006. Method variance in organizationalresearch: Truth or urban legend. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2):221-232.) y$ e2 Z+ u# X# C4 S7 O5 v

8 W4 R" t/ ?& W1 r1 rIssue 18: Data Non-independence  D( x, s* B4 a2 D  h
18-01.  Glick, W. H., & Roberts, K. H. 1984. Hypothesized interdependence, assumedindependence. Academy of Management Review, 9: 722–735.
, ~, ^. |% j2 x18-02.  Kenny, D. A. 1995. The effect of nonindependence onsignificance testing in dyadic research. Personal Relationships, 2:67-75.
, N/ o% `8 O$ e; ~18-03.  Kenny, D.A. & Judd, C. M. 1986. Consequences ofviolating the interdependence assumption in analysis of variance. PsychologicalBulletin, 99: 422-431.: m$ i4 G7 _+ Y* y+ H3 T
18-04.  Bliese, P. & Hanges, P. J. 2004. Being too liberal and tooconservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they wereindependent. Organizational Research Methods, 7: 400-417.
; m( {4 h# U. \* T18-05.  彭台光 & 林鉦棽 2008. 組織現象和層次議題: 非獨立性資料的概念和實徵. 組織與管理, 1(1): 95-121.
* n3 R& q0 q3 t18-06.  Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. 1995. On thelevel: Homogeneity, independence, heterogeneity, and interactions inorganizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 20: 7-9.& \1 |# ]2 |' u
18-07.  Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., &Kashy, D. A. 2002. The statistical analysis of data from small groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83: 126-137.
7 n" [; b$ u+ n$ T8 z0 R; @# i  ]( q# _9 _8 H( n; i
Issue 19: The Culture Factor (Cross-cultural and IndigenousResearch)# q  X. Y7 \- {8 A6 C. ^
19-01.  Adler, N. A., Campbell, N. & Laurent, A. 1989. In search ofappropriate methodology: From outside the People’s Republic of China lookingin. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1): 61-74.5 ~( s  m) y9 [- n% R" V) L5 r
19-02.  Boisot, M. & Child. J. 1996. From fiefs to clans andnetwork capitalism: Explaining China’s emerging economic order. AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 41(4): 600-628.
  R$ _- G4 ^; R3 n19-03.  Chen, C. C., Chen, Y. R., & Xin, K. 2004. Guanxi practicesand trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. OrganizationScience, 15: 200-209.
& n/ b, w# y8 P19-04.  Farh, J. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. S. 1998. Theinfluence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. OrganizationScience, 9: 471-488.
" C- h! Y0 q& L  _19-05.  Farh, J. L. & Cheng, B. S. 2000. A cultural analysis ofpaternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui,& E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context.London: MacMillan, 2000: 84-127.* {+ {& t. c$ ^$ x# b
19-06.  Hwang, K. K. 1987. Face and favor: The Chinese power game. AmericanJournal of Sociology, 92(4): 944-974./ b/ n% Z) J% \8 l! c+ @) K! l
19-07.  Leung, K. & Bond, M. 1989. On the empirical identificationof dimensions for cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Cross-CulturalPsychology, 20, 2, 133-151.
- s9 n) I8 H, R9 h3 x6 c19-08.  Schaffer, B.S. 2003. A review of cross-cultural methodologiesfor organizational research: A best-practices approach. OrganizationalResearch Methods, 6(2): 169-215./ G' G) F9 _4 M
19-09.  楊國樞(主編) 1993「本土心理學的開展」 (本土心理學研究第一期),台北:台灣大學心理系本土心理學研究室。
- E+ e/ I  K$ n) [! {, _; p- ^# s" \5 u3 J# }
19-10.  楊國樞(主編) 1996。「本土心理學方法論」(本土心理學研究第八期),台北:台灣大學心理系本土心理學研究室。
) P" j; w4 q5 ?! \; Y. P8 Z. A& \# I3 t8 H4 L
19-11.  陳曉萍等(2008):Ch4: 建構華人管理學理論的機會與挑戰1 E* K5 N! b& Q- \. z9 Q
* p2 v2 C# e. ~6 g
19-12.  陳曉萍等(2008):ch173 o7 p4 a) l: ~% O* S
19-13.  Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oraland written materials. In H. C. Triandis, & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbookof cross-cultural psychology. Vol. 2: Methodology (pp. 389^I44).Boston, MA: Allyn Bacon.1 g* S* p: w; m
19-14.  Tsui, A. (2004). Contributing to global managementknowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia PacificJournal of Management, 21, 491-513.
8 f5 X: u& l+ a7 w6 f1 [9 J" }1 K$ B1 n9 q: K$ o
Issue 20: Structural Equation Modeling# x. z( e# w, }6 @/ _
K & L: Chapter 35.) b+ ^0 _0 M4 k6 [
20-01.  林清山 1984。「線性結構關係」(LISREL)電腦程式。中國測驗年會測驗學刊31:149-164
6 `1 @. b' x2 i" m2 `+ c20-02.  Feldt, T., Kivimaki, M., Rantala, A., & Tolvanen, A. 2004.Sense of coherence and work characteristics: A cross-lagged structural equationmodeling with managers. Journal of Occupational and OrganizationalPsychology, 77: 323-342.- t& W9 P4 T7 D, A7 B" K# {$ i  V2 k
20-03.  Jonge, J. de, Dormann, C., Janssen, P. P. M., Dollard, M. F.,Landeweerd, J. A., & Nijhuis, F. J. N. 2001. Testing reciprocalrelationships between job characteristics and psychological well-being: Across-lagged structural equation model. Journal of Occupational and OrganizationalPsychology, 74: 29-46.
% k& k3 z! H8 A5 g1 g20-04.  Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. 1992. Analysis ofmultitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. PsychologicalBulletin, 112: 165-172.+ y( X" d' v+ D
20-05.  Lytle, A. L., Brett, J. M., Barsness, Z. I., Tinsley, C.H.,& Janssens, M. 1995. A paradigm for confirmatory cross-cultural research inorganizational behavior. Research in Organization Behavior, 17: 167-214.4 I5 R! W& h. w0 e' W# O8 N2 M
20-06.  Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. 1994. An alternativeapproach to method effects using latent-variable models: Applications inorganizational behavior research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3):323-331.) P" z( C$ P! V! E3 h8 S6 O
20-07.  Williams, L. J. & Brown, B. K. 1994. Method Variance inorganizational behavior and human resources research: Effects on correlations,path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organizational Behavior and HumanDecision Process. 57: 185-209.3 i9 B, u+ A2 P4 k& l' S& n
20-08.  Meade, A. W., & Kroustalis, C. M. 2006. Problems with itemparceling for comfirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance. OrganizationalResearch Methods, 9: 369-403.
3 V1 x3 J2 Y6 Z20-09.  陳曉萍等(2008):ch133 X( g! ]; V% P2 I1 ]- N# O  H7 s* o
6 z' G" A! d1 V9 w# @
Issue 21: Level as Knowing: Holism
; o$ ^2 e3 Z" d9 n6 V21-01.  Courgeau, D. 2003. General introduction. In D. Courgeau (Ed.), Methodologyand Epistemology of multilevel analysis: Approaches from different socialsciences (pp.1-23). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
. ^' a- N6 t/ L6 x8 L2 X6 K9 u21-02.  Butz, M. R. 1997. Chaos and complexity: Implications forpsychological theory and practice (Chapter 1, pp. 3-24). London: Taylor& Francis.! H; r$ N  [5 W6 B8 A) V
21-03.  Barton, S. 1994. Chaos, self-organization, and psychology. AmericanPsychologist, 49: 5-14.
. y4 t; C* \& J, M: X8 e7 n9 g/ v21-04.  Pinder, C.C., & Bourgeois, V.W. 1982. Controlling tropes inadministrative science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 641-652.
! W. b+ E" u9 w' |: H- ]8 ]3 i21-05.  Morgan, G. (1983). More on metaphor: Why we cannot controltropes in administrative science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28:601-607.0 @6 k" _' p" S9 T, N( s4 M
21-06.  Bourgeois, V.W., & Pinder, C.C. 1983. Contrastingphilosophical perspectives in administrative science: A reply to Morgan. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28:608-613.
" s; A# i( r1 k0 |' M6 e$ H5 d" T21-07.  Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. 1978. The social psychology oforganizations. NY: Wiley (Chapters 1-3, pp. 1-68)./ x# j6 k* v3 u8 Y8 e' ~
21-08.  von Bertalanffy, L. 1972. The history and status of generalsystems theory. In G.J. Klir (Ed.), Trends in general systems theory(pp. 21-41). NY: Wiley.
/ ]  \1 t9 p; Z! u21-09.  von Bertalanffy, L. 1968. General system theory. NY:Braziller (Chapters 1 & 2, pp. 3-53).
4 b0 K( @0 m. P$ a0 [, k# s21-10.  Miller, J. G. 1978. Living systems. NY: McGraw-Hill(Preface, Chapter 2, pp. 9-50)., i1 @/ T6 _: ?% B
! }7 `& }0 p  k9 I: V
Issue 22: Level Fallacies
  F4 t/ m) m( h8 a. n22-01.  Allport, F. H. (1924). The group fallacy in relation tosocial science. JournalofAbnormal and SocialPsychology, 19(1), 60-73.3 ^% |+ l! t/ W1 f$ `
22-02.  Allport, F. H. (1924). Dicsussion: The group fallacy inrelation to social science. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 19(2),185-191." |7 s9 g9 ]4 S! ~
22-03.  **Thorndike, E. L. (1939). On the fallacy of imputing thecorrelations found for groups to the individuals or smaller groups composingthem. American Journal of Psychology, 52, 122-124.: n/ D* s4 p; R3 g
22-04.  Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and thebehavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15,351-357.
7 X: c* l( h$ V9 j# U" V" U22-05.  **Schwartz, S. (1994). The fallacy of the ecological fallacy:The potential misuse of a concept and the consequences. American Journal ofPublic Health, 84, 819-824.
  _$ q' i2 [5 a4 @7 m22-06.  Hammond, J. L. (1973). Two sources of error in ecologicalcorrelations. American Sociological Review, 38(6), 764-777.
- O( y- X7 c: P( L& F
6 L3 Q0 @; X! g. oIssue 23: Multilevel Nature of Organizational Phenomena
. B4 Y0 Z$ W- I, ^: w23-01.  James, L. R., & Jones, A. P. 1974. Organizationalclimate: A review of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 81:1096-1112.
/ r3 @8 _: O# u; s  w23-02.  Simon, H.A. 1973. The organization of complex systems. In H.H.Pattee (Ed.), Hierarchy theory (pp. 1-27). NY: Braziller., v6 @9 c% W9 r1 t; B8 Q  ]
23-03.  Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Doherty, M. L. 1989. Integrationof leadership and climate: Examination of a neglected issue. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 74(4): 546-553.; _2 Q! A% m' N" u1 |
23-04.  Rousseau, D. M. l978. Characteristics of departmentspositions, and individuals: Contexts for attitudes and behavior. AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 23: 52l-540.5 o) s9 i  i. P7 X
23-05.  **Feldman, D. C. 1984. The development and enforcement ofgroup norms. Academy of Management Review, 9: 47-53.
. r& \4 o% W1 k6 g, |23-06.  Johns, G. 1999. A multi-level theory of self-serving behaviorin and by organizations. In Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior,21: 1-38.
6 t6 O( `5 X/ N* x+ {. K23-07.  Weingart, L. 1997. How did they do that? The ways and means ofstudying group process. In Staw B. M., & Cummings L. L. (Eds.), Research inOrganizational Behavior, 19: 189-239.
" A' X0 ]9 n2 n9 V4 F! a$ \23-08.  Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects ofteam diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic analysis of team demography.Journal of Management, 33, 6, 987-1005.- w1 V& ]$ a4 T0 Z7 n9 L" h
23-09.  Johns, G. 2001. In praise of context. Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 22: 31-42.
% \6 `4 v- @7 m/ ^* J2 S; a  F23-10.  Brass, D. J. l98l. Structural relationships, jobcharacteristics, and worker satisfaction and performance. AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 26, 33l-348.
  ^# e: T9 O) D3 \9 c23-11.  Rousseau, D. M. 1978. Measures of technology as predictorsof employee attitude. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63: 213-218.+ c# r/ w$ V7 D- b2 T% w. z
23-12.  Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Farr, J. L. 1988. An integrativemodel of updating and performance. Human Performance, 1: 5-29.
0 m: o5 t! a. M8 E6 ^: c23-13.  Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. 1981.Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 26, 501-524.
% O% @$ t9 N5 R+ [9 n6 N3 Q6 w23-14.  **Ostroff, C. 1992. The relationship between satisfaction,attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 77(6): 963-974.
$ ?9 K( p5 Z% v2 ~6 B. h/ Y0 ^4 l3 w' D" c5 g3 c2 c1 s/ F
Issue 24: Levels in Theory Building
( |0 E+ \4 w8 l* {: U! U! V- ]$ ]24-01.  Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J.E. 2007. Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevelresearch in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1385-1399.- g3 ^# E7 x5 c$ x3 h
24-02.  Klein, K. J., Cannella, A., & Tosi, H. 1999. Multileveltheory: Challenges and contributions. Academy of Management Review, 24,243-248.+ f: q6 I$ b. D; |, e
24-03.  Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F. J., & Kohles, J. C. 1999. Multiple levelsof analysis from a longitudinal perspective: Some implications for theorybuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 24: 346-357.7 Q+ x+ m# E" A  v& ?3 A. r; {3 y7 ]
24-04.  Klein, K., Dansereau, F. & Hall, R. 1994. Level issuesin theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of ManagementReview, 19, 195-229.8 X/ q% o  x8 ?, G" v- m
24-05.  George, J. M., & James, L. R. 1994. Levels issues in theory development. Academyof Management Review, 19: 639-640. (Critique of Klein et al., 1994)* c' e( O' Y) |; f4 b
24-06.  Klein, K., Dansereau, F. & Hall, R. 1994. On the level:Homogeneity, independence, heterogeneity, and interactions in organizationtheory. Academy of Management Review, 20: 7-17. (Response to George & James, 1994)
2 d7 E" |$ A5 q: `; s2 G0 m24-07.  Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizationalresearch: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research inOrganizational Behavior, 7: 1-37.( o1 j, t( N/ _1 K
24-08.  Mossholder, K. W. & Bedeian, A. G.. 1983. Cross-level inference andorganizational research: Perspectives on interpretation and application.Academy of Management Review, 8(4): 547-558.
. j0 ^1 S5 a* B( H$ I24-09.  Glick, W. H. (1980). Problems in cross-level inference. In K.H.Roberts & L. Burstein (eds.) Issues in Aggregation. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass. 17-30.
" Y0 f: N+ J& f& V; P0 y24-10.  Roberts, K. H., Hulin, C. L., & Rousseau, D. M. 1978. Developing an interdisciplinaryscience of organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (Chapters 1-3, pp.1-80).
( W7 U. _# F6 s24-11.  Behling, O. 1978. Some problems in the philosophy of science oforganizations. Academy of Management Review, 3: 193-201.
! [8 Y% q* z; Z* R  X2 s% f8 f, y* A4 L4 s* U
Issue 25: Meso Paradigm: An Integral Perspective
- J) |' L; {# V) B# D  ?% Y3 h1 U  s25-01.  **Hackman, J. R. 2003. Learning more by cross level: Evidencefrom airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. Journal of OrganizationalBehavior, 24: 905-922.3 L3 x; ^* Q# c7 n, f/ B
25-02.  **House, R. J., Rousseau, D.M., & Thomas-Hunt, M. 1995. The mesoparadigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizationalbehavior. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research inOrganizational Behavior, 17: 71-114.
' Y1 H# N* l1 O) d1 Y  K25-03.  Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N. 1982. Toward a macro-orientedmodel of leadership: An odyssey, In J.G. Hunt, U. Sekaran, & C. Schrieshiem(Eds.), Leadership: Beyond Establishment Views, Carbondale, IL: SouthernIllinois University Press.
, g( ?9 d7 e! r  k25-04.  Hofmann, D. A., & Stetzer, A. 1996. A cross-levelinvestigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents. PersonnelPsychology, 49: 307-338.4 D1 H$ D& Y9 p& C
25-05.  Glick, W.H. 1985. Conceptualizing and measuring organizationaland psychological climate: Pitfalls of multilevel research. Academy ofManagement Review, 10: 601-610.
% L9 Q. e) j) g! P25-06.  Tosi, H. 1992. The organization and the environment: The E/Olink in the model. The Environment/Organization/Person Contingency Model: AMeso Approach to the Study of Organizations. 29-66. Greenwich, Conn: JAI.+ X9 p. r! ], ]$ a) b% O
25-07.  Cappelli, P., & Sherer, P. 1991. The missing role ofcontext in OB: The need for a meso-level approach. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research inOrganizational Behavior, 13: 55-110.
* M" o5 \$ s' e7 P0 R" G. L) X9 |6 n: T
Issue 26: Extending Multilevel Organizational Theory $ E1 S8 a5 B8 G+ d9 M) i% W
26-01.  **Kozlowski, S.W.J. & Kline, K. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory andresearch in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K.and K, 3-90.
+ p) X3 }! j: s5 N. I7 c26-02.  Klein, K., Palmer, S. L., Conn, A. B. 2000. InterorganizationalRelationships: A multilevel perspective. In K. and K. 267-307.2 f( |) ]! S% g8 B, {
26-03.  Chao, G. T. 2000. Multilevel issues and culture: An integrativeview. In K. & K. 308-346.! G: c3 r: p! q4 }7 T
# {6 e9 L6 y- m0 k3 v3 @% |
Issue 27: Research Design in Multilevel Research: c) v: X' _( X; f
27-01.  **林鉦棽 & 彭台光 2006。多層次管理研究:分析層次的概念、理論和方法。管理學報23(6): 649-675.
) j. G9 G& V9 _$ g8 \' c1 g27-02.  **Hofmann, D.A. 2002. Issues in multilevel research: Theorydevelopment, measurement, and analysis. In S.G. Rogelberg’s(ed.) Handbook of Research Methods inIndustrial and Organizational Psychology. 247-274. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.* x* u0 T- f2 J' ~
27-03.  Kline, K. J. &Kozlowski, S. J. 2000. From micro to meso: Critical stepsin conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. OrganizationalResearch methods, 3(3): 211-236.
4 G1 }/ U" ]. `9 z: M0 D3 J2 k9 \% f* Q3 t- B% J+ z/ b3 l
Issue 28: Phenomena from Micro to Macro: An Emerging Process
/ o2 L/ D( g3 k2 U: }28-01.  Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. 1999. The structure and function ofcollective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theorydevelopment. Academy of Management Review, 24: 249-265.+ O* h1 U8 s& P6 D2 m
28-02.  Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. 1978. A social information processing approachto job attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23: 224-253.
, ?$ }5 v9 v3 S+ |28-03.  Schneider, B. 1987. The people make the place. PersonnelPsychology, 40, 437-453.' j! z; T- s# a& M4 Q
28-04.  Schneider, B. 1995. The ASA framework: An update. PersonnelPsychology, 48, 747-773.+ L9 o6 w$ |" x/ |! T# G. `  ?; O
28-05.  Walter, F., & Bruch, H. 2008. The positive group affectspiral: A dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity inwork groups. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 29, 239-261.
1 v% e& A. ~6 Y% f" t. m
9 r& U, h& ?3 X2 H: g: T6 _+ K3 lIssue 29: Measurement and Aggregation: E& t4 w9 J3 y1 \' J1 ?& y
29-01.  Bartko, J. J. 1976. On various intraclass correlationreliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83(5): 762-765.% x/ ^0 O! t3 G; d8 y
29-02.  Burke, M. J. & Dunlap, W. P. 2002. Estimating interrateragreement with the average deviation index: A user’s guide. OrganizationalResearch Methods, 5(2): 159-172.2 w# q# ?; s" \& d
29-03.  James, L. R. l982. Aggregation bias in estimates ofperceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 2l9-229.- z/ z) a. F# G! Q# \/ Z$ U/ ]* P- u
29-04.  **James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., & Wolf, G. 1984. Estimatingwith-group reliability with and without response bias. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 69(1): 85-98.
, W0 y- C5 h0 O4 w) y29-05.  James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., & Wolf, G. 1993. Rwg: Anassessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 78(2): 306-309.
2 a6 |% {9 T4 C) U29-06.  Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Hattrup, K. 1992. A disagreementabout within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versusconsensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(2): 161-167.4 l  a; m9 v5 p/ f7 `9 K* X
29-07.  Ostroff, C, 1993. Comparing correlations based onindividual-level and aggregated data. Journal of Applied Psychology,78(2): 569-582.( \: G9 K' ?8 }* f$ g9 I  A
29-08.  Freeman, J. 1980. The unit problem in organizational research.In W.M. Evan (Ed.), Frontiers in organization and management (pp.59-68). NY: Praeger.
' G3 ?( _4 I0 a1 A( C! ?9 T29-09.  Campbell, D. T. 1958. Common fate, similarity, and otherindices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities.Behavioral Science, 3: 14-25.5 u2 M: u1 _( a8 X! E# O. v% b
29-10.  Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Hults, B. M. l987. Anexploration of climates for technical updating and performance. PersonnelPsychology, 40: 539-563.9 i2 ~& h" I" E5 E
29-11. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. 1989. Interrater reliability coefficientscannot be computed when only one stimulus is rated. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 74: 368-370.9 l0 b8 _. M% E9 H# X, Y' M
29-12.  Bliese, P. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, andreliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein& S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods inorganizations (349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.9 g" @8 G+ S6 {- v* x# _1 }
29-13.  Bliese, P. D. 1998. Group size, ICC values, and group-levelcorrelations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1: 355-373.( o3 W& s. E$ Q4 {0 H1 L" j
29-14.  Bliese, P. D., & Halverson, R. R. 1998. Group size andmeasures of group-level properties: An examination of eta-squared and ICCvalues. Journal of Management, 24: 157-172.
* n6 `5 ]6 E- n, S1 ~29-15.  Bliese, P. D. & Hanges, P. J. 2004. Being too liberal andtoo conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they wereindependent. Organizational Research Methods, 7: 400-417.
$ Q# U" ~& j' W: P2 O+ {29-16.  **Castro, S. L. 2002. Data analytic methods for the analysis ofmultilevel questions: A comparison of intraclass correlation coefficients,rwg(j), hierarchical linear modeling, within- and between-analysis, and randomgroup resampling.Leadership Quarterly, 13: 69-93.6 S+ v& @) O3 s, ^' R, [
29-17.  Lindell, M. K., & Brandt, C. J. 2000. Climate quality andclimate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizationalantecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 331–348.
1 ]9 K3 y+ Z% N  P$ w3 _29-18.  Lindell, M. K., Brand, C. J., & Whitney, D. J. 1999. Arevised index of interrater agreement for multitem rating of a single target.Applied Psychological Measurement, 23: 127-135." u$ s: g0 l' g# C" M
29-19.  McGraw, K. O. & Wong, S. P. 1996. Forming inferences aboutsome intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1:30–46.5 h) {, b' _" N
29-20.  Bliese P. D., Halverson, R. R., & Rothberg, J. M. 1994.Within-group agreement scores: Using resampling procedures to estimate expectedvariance. Academy Management Best Paper Proceeding, 306-307.
& Z5 f* q6 `' ]0 U* r/ }29-21.  Burke, M. J., Finkelstein, L. M., & Dusig, M. S. 1999. Onaverage deviation indices for estimating interrater agreement.Organizational Research Methods, 2(1): 49-68.
2 X( A1 |" s) J5 |) w5 C! `8 T( t: g2 i1 T
Issue 30: Approaches to Multilevel Data Analysis
" J# C( {0 h' }5 C( B, W30-01.  Firebaugh, G. 1979. Assessing group effects: A comparison oftwo methods. Sociological Methods and Research, 7: 384-395.: @4 D3 m6 J- K2 w6 ]
30-02.  James, L. R., & Williams, L. 2000. The cross-level operator in regression,ANCOVA, and contextual analysis. In K. & K. 382-424.- V" J1 U8 x8 e3 {6 A8 R! y- n; G
30-03.  George, J. M. 1990. Personality, affect, and behavior ingroups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 107-116.
3 J8 d  m1 ~! f) _# n30-04.  Yammarino, F. J., & Markham, S. E. 1992. On theapplication of within and between analysis: Are absence and affect reallygroup-based phenomenon? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 168-176.
8 a$ t0 S+ s5 d& Y9 m' [) `( P8 S' Y. E30-05.  George, J. M., & James, L. R. 1993. Personality, affect, and behavior ingroups revisited: Comment on aggregation, level of analysis, and recentapplication of within and between analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78:798-804.
  M# w0 k, {8 @1 c$ s6 G30-06.  **Chan, D. 1998. Functional relations among constructs in thesame content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of compositionmodels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 234-246.- G8 V& U! Y' Q
30-07.  Leung, K. & Bond, M. H. 1989. On the empiricalidentifications of dimensions of cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Cross-CulturalPsychology, 20(2): 133-151.2 X0 l4 h% b6 ~+ W" g- J' x/ I7 j
30-08.  Peterson, M. F. & Castro, S. 2006. Measurement metrics ataggregate levels of analysis: Implications for organization culture researchand the GLOBE project. Leadership Quarterly, 17: 506-521.
) u! s( o7 r: H$ T4 O# N30-09.  Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F. J., & Kohles, J. 1999. Multiple levels ofanalysis from a longitudinal perspective: Some implications for theorybuilding. Academy of Management Review, 24: 346-357.
; l+ y( p5 \' a* A8 O30-10.  **Klein, K. J., Bliese, P. D., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Dansereau, F., Gavin, M. B., Griffin,M. A., Hofmann, D. A., James, L. R., Yammarino, F. J., & Bligh, M. C. 2000 Multilevelanalytical techniques: Commonalities, differences, and continuing questions.In K. & K. 512-553.
. g* r/ e/ H( k" T6 \. P/ o
& y. U3 E5 H! w  Z3 f2 OIssue 31: Introduction to HLM
- X4 M. h) a: e7 Z4 ]# x) B9 E; T31-01.  **Hofmann, D. A. 1997. An overview of the logic and rationaleof HLM. Journal of Management. 23(6): 723-744.& y6 U, x" Y& R/ v1 ~
31-02.  Hofmann, D. A. & Griffin, M. A., Gavin, M. B. 2000. Theapplication of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K.& K. 467-511.
! C* b0 u( M6 t+ R; D31-03.  **Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. 1998. Centeringdecisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research inorganizations. Journal of Management, 24: 623-641.
) O2 h( w0 t1 u: O3 U4 i31-04.  Klein, K. J., Conn, A. B., Smith, D. B., & Sorra, J. S. (2001). Is everyonein agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptionsof the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 3-16.7 h8 n$ F3 f; v! V1 B

5 N5 f+ d# n" T' LIssue 32: Empirical Examples of HLM
' G" c( ^& t) H' g4 Z) E4 e" @32-01.  Bloom, M., & Milkovich, G. 1998. Relationships among risk,incentive pay, and organizational performance. Academy of ManagementJournal, 41: 283-297.
- W& V/ V0 J( D* P4 m# j32-02.  **Cole, M. S. & Bedeian, A. G. 2007. Leadership consensus as a cross-levelcontextual moderator of the emotion exhaustion-work commitment relationship. LeadershipQuarterly, 18: 447-462.
" X- L) O, a! c) s' w32-03.  Eyring, J. D., Johnson, D. S., & Francis, D. J. 1993. Across-level units-of-analysis approach to individual differences in skillacquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 805-815.
" u( f4 `1 D# ]! Y! M32-04.  Gavin, M. B., & Hofmann, D. A. 2002. Using hierarchical linear modeling toinvestigate the moderating influence of leadership climate. LeadershipQuarterly, 13: 15-33.* W  G) I* G5 I- L
32-05.  **Erhart, M. G. 2004. Leadership and procedural justice climateas antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. PersonnelPsychology, 57: 61-94.
: e  {% O, S$ R* ~0 P: y, o4 z! ^# r7 m32-06.  Glission, C., & James, L. R. 2002. The cross-level effects of culture andclimate in human service teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23:767-794.
5 f8 ?8 X) e1 T6 r3 m  I1 i32-07.  Hofmann, D. A., & Jones, L. M. 2005. Leadership,collective personality, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology,90: 509-522.9 P1 \! T$ G% ~) o1 n
32-08.  Kark, R., Shamir, B., Chen, G. 2003. The two faces oftransformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency.Journal ofApplied Psychology, 88(2): 246-255.
+ W  y: H5 W3 r; Q' r$ E32-09.  Kidwell, R. E., Mossholder, K.W., & Bennett, N. 1997.Cohesiveness and organizational citizenship behavior: A multilevel analysisusing work groups and individuals. Journal of Management, 23: 775-793.' N4 T8 S3 Z7 w1 I' P, |
32-10.  Paris, L. 2004. The effects of gender and culture on implicitleadership theories: A cross-cultural study. William H. Newman Award, Academyof Management meeting. (Award given to a single-authored paper based ondissertation)
: P# Q1 S4 s6 x32-11.  Sacco, J. M., & Schmitt, N. 2005. A dynamic multilevel model of demographicdiversity and misfit effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2):203-231.
& f+ \: p1 _- P' O% C/ ~32-12.  Steensma, H. K., Marino, L., & Dickson, P. H. 2000. Theinfluence of national cultural on the formation of technology alliances byentrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 951-973.) W" w# n* T- U! b% ^( d$ x' I( z3 v
32-13.  Steward, G. L., Fulmer, I. S., & Barrick, M. R. 2005. Anexploration of member roles as a multilevel linking mechanism for individualtraits and team outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58: 343-365.* ^6 @9 d) U3 @  g# F8 q" @; Q
32-14.  Vancouver, J. B. 1997. The application of HLM to the analysisof the dynamic interaction of environment, person and behavior. Journal ofManagement, 23: 795-818.1 L' X5 F7 G7 F
32-15.  Whitener, E. M. 2001. Do “high commitment” human resource practicesaffect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linearmodeling. Journal of Management, 27: 515-535.1 @, V9 t, Q# p6 k

7 Y% `% n, Z) b/ {4 N6 sIssue 33: Extended Issues in Multilevel Research9 h5 Z8 J* b8 E. w
33-01.  Brass, D. J. 2000. Networks and Frog Ponds: Trends inmultilevel research. In K.& K. 557-571.& W6 n' A: |7 c) V5 E* d
33-02. Rousseau, D. M. 2000. Multilevel competencies and missinglinkages. In K. & K. 572-582.
. e) k! F( B0 O) W33-03.  Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F. J., & Kohles, J. C. 1999. Multiple levelsof analysis from a longitudinal perspective: Some implications for theorybuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 24: 346-357.9 I/ h. t  s* _& s! Q( d; M
33-04.  Chen, G., Mathieu, J. E., & Bliese, P. D. 2004. Aframework for conducting multilevel construct validation. In F. J. Yammarino& F. Dansereau (Eds.), Research inmultilevel issues: Multilevel issues in organizational behavior and processes (Vol.3): 273-303. Elsevier: Oxford, U.K.% s- v( D% m" }! A( m. S( o* P/ A; [$ |
33-05.  Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. E. 2007. A framework fortesting meso-mediational relationships in Organizational Behavior. Journalof Organizational Behavior, 28: 141-172.
* L3 _, X' K! i2 m33-06.  Krull, J. L. & Mackinnon, D. P. 2001. Multilevel modelingof individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate BehavioralResearch, 36(2): 249-277.3 T6 Z2 B/ V  h6 H; Y+ ?

6 B1 @9 i9 j- R$ eIssue 34: Report Writing and Paper Review
* U; V% v  e- y% l5 h5 G2 j' oSchwab: Chapters 15 and 21
- R& P/ V6 J6 U: v34-01.  應用心理學刊給審稿者的一封信: y, n* A" Q/ B% c7 Z! |
34-02.  Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Colbert, A.E., & Rynes, S.L. 2007. What cause a management article to becited—Article, author, or journal? Academy of Management Journal, 50(3):491-506.
# e3 R* u/ `/ b; m4 _7 T34-03.  Bartunek, J. M., Rynes, S. L., & Ireland, R. D. 2006. What makes a management researchinteresting and why does it matter? Academy of Management Journal,49(1): 9-15.
, b, @" I/ k. z) M" [( y# c$ y2 R34-04.  **Tsui, A. 2005. Guidelines on writing a research manuscript.(one page handout).) G3 Q( ?' U! I" G0 r; p3 M
34-05.  Bacharach, S. B. 1989. Organizational theories: Somecriteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 496-515.% D4 V6 q$ N$ J6 n4 r
34-06.  **Daft, R. L. 1995. Why I recommended that your manuscript berejected and what you can do about it. In L.L. Cummings & P.J. Frost(eds.), Publishing in the Organizational Science, 2nd ed.,164-182. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
$ s1 A2 d; |" M  L5 C5 W34-07.  **Feldman, D. C. 2004a. The devil in the details: Convertinggood research into publishable articles. Journal of Management, 30(1):1-6.- D6 d( s  S  B- z/ ~
34-08.  Feldman, D. C. 2004b. Being a developmental reviewer:Easier said than done. Journal of Management, 30(2): 161-164.
$ m/ j0 N# g2 w: M2 J34-09.  Feldman, D. C. 2004c. Negotiating the revision process. Journalof Management, 30(3): 305-307.
+ c3 H) T+ A* ?4 x* X6 ]34-10.  Lee, A.S. 1995. Reviewing a manuscript for publication. Journalof Operations Management, 13(1): 87-92.) u; Y4 X! Y6 U
. @0 Y0 q& W; B1 Q, X  E/ q
Issue 35: Wrap-up: Alternatives to Positivism
6 ]; ]+ C/ S! S) P$ ?  B, k. S35-01.  **童元方2003. 追蹤天才之源。
) r: v2 g5 v7 e1 E9 I0 i水流花靜---科學與詩的對話
. k% c) i% U; {1 t+ D: ]& S; S; T5 [$ rP.121~139.台北:天下文化。7 b! A% \. R5 |: n! q
35-02.  Smith, K. G., & Hitt, M. A. 2005. Learning how to developtheories from the masters. In K.G. Smith & M.A. Hitt (Eds.) Great mindsin management: The process of theory development, pp. 573-588. New York:Oxford University Press.3 b4 C' F- c. E4 y" `- t6 N
35-03.  Bartunek, J. M., & Seo, M. G. 2002. Qualitativeresearch can add new meanings to quantitative research. Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 23: 237-242.7 b. r% {5 Z2 z2 P# s: L
35-04.  Burrell, G. & Morgan, G. 1979. Assumptions about the nature of Science. SociologicalParadigms and Organizational Analysis. 1-9. Portsmouth, NH: HeinemannEducational Books.) |& h9 X3 V* a1 a1 g- M# F
35-05.  Canella, A. A. Jr., & Paetzold, R. L. 1994. Pfeffer’sbarriers to the advance of organizational science: A rejoinder. Academy ofManagement Review. 19(2): 331-341.
8 J1 O9 Q6 j+ Z7 E35-06.  Cohen, J. 1990. Things I have learned (so far). AmericanPsychologist, 45(12): 1304-1312.4 h' z! e" x+ A% u3 T: }6 }( v" U3 [
35-07.  Journal of Management. 1985. Special issue onorganizational symbolism. 11(2).6 d" j# [3 q7 `* |, ?
35-08.  Pfeffer, J. 1993. Barriers to the advance of organizationalscience: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of ManagementReview. 18: 599-620.: W) k, O+ X; X8 m; {
35-09.  **Prasad, A. & Prasad, P. 2002. The coming of age ofinterpretive organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 5(1):4-11. (A special issue on interpretive genres of organizational researchmethods)
# B2 o% [. j9 S35-10.  Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. 2000. A Review andSynthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, andRecommendations for Organizational Research. Organizational ResearchMethods, 3: 4-70.
( l# e- l3 B; [% v" T! K8 K35-11.  Vandenberg, R. J. 2002. Toward a Further Understanding ofand Improvement in Measurement Invariance Methods and Procedures. OrganizationalResearch Methods, 5: 139-158.  w* C% V5 [; ~8 T
35-12.  Hitt, M. A., Gimono, J., & Hoskinsson, R. E. 1998. Currentand Future Research in Strategic Management. Organizational ResearchMethods, 1: 6-44.
7 z, v' Z; f0 ]! V/ c35-13.  Chan, D. 1998. The conceptualization and analysis of changeover time. Organizational Research Methods, 1(4): 418-489.
( }! Z) @5 W) a. M35-14.  **Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. 2006. Thesources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? OrganizationalResearch Methods, 9: 202-220.
) w$ b* v* p# g4 F) a; T1 |1 s
' q/ n" g; R- u, ]+ v* e/ ~) J
<<End>>
本帖最后由 Kenneth 于 2011-5-3 15:37 编辑
9 ^/ t8 W) o1 o0 i5 Y% O9 _2 |7 S. S: f

33

主题

6

听众

7709

积分

贡士

Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15

注册时间
2010-4-15
最后登录
2013-9-16
积分
7709
精华
0
主题
33
帖子
610
沙发
发表于 2011-5-4 00:34:09 |只看该作者
是彭台光老師的課,內容看起來相當充實。
回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

5

听众

1321

积分

秀才

Rank: 5Rank: 5

注册时间
2010-6-27
最后登录
2014-7-25
积分
1321
精华
0
主题
0
帖子
27
板凳
发表于 2011-5-4 16:53:25 |只看该作者
向Kenny致敬!
回复

使用道具 举报

4

主题

6

听众

577

积分

秀才

Rank: 5Rank: 5

注册时间
2010-6-29
最后登录
2024-12-5
积分
577
精华
0
主题
4
帖子
53
地板
发表于 2011-5-5 11:47:45 |只看该作者
好的信息来源,谢谢kenny!!
回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

6

听众

990

积分

秀才

Rank: 5Rank: 5

注册时间
2010-8-2
最后登录
2014-7-22
积分
990
精华
0
主题
0
帖子
16
5
发表于 2011-5-9 21:16:49 |只看该作者
非常好的研究方法学习资料,thank you Kenny!!
回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

6

听众

67

积分

书生

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

注册时间
2011-4-20
最后登录
2012-8-30
积分
67
精华
0
主题
0
帖子
2
6
发表于 2011-5-16 15:57:30 |只看该作者
谢谢kenneth老师:)
回复

使用道具 举报

1

主题

6

听众

23

积分

书童

Rank: 1

注册时间
2011-6-16
最后登录
2012-9-19
积分
23
精华
0
主题
1
帖子
5
7
发表于 2011-6-16 22:28:42 |只看该作者
非常感谢Kenneth老师,您真的太伟大了。向您致敬!
回复

使用道具 举报

3

主题

5

听众

43

积分

书童

Rank: 1

注册时间
2010-11-10
最后登录
2014-6-6
积分
43
精华
0
主题
3
帖子
14
8
发表于 2011-8-6 19:29:46 |只看该作者
回复 1楼 Kenneth 的帖子
& k7 F5 D7 X4 j# m5 O( v) E+ Z1 G4 a, `9 g" Z( c, K
你真是太伟大了,拥抱你!!!
# n" K) }7 e; H( E/ T   
回复

使用道具 举报

7

主题

10

听众

439

积分

书生

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

注册时间
2014-8-10
最后登录
2016-2-29
积分
439
精华
0
主题
7
帖子
61
9
发表于 2014-8-25 19:29:15 |只看该作者
哇,这个太好啦,非常感谢
回复

使用道具 举报