Method Bias的文献

myth1949

/ T0 V. L/ c' L3 n* ^. m

Avolio, B.J.,Yammarino, F.J. & Bass, B.M. (1991), ‘Identifying common methods variancewith data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue’, Journalof Management, 17(3), 571-587.

6 U. H  w. D. P3 P, h' x
! o, E; l$ @4 G( b; y! x8 ]) J( _

Bagozzi, R.P.& Yi, Y. (1990), ‘Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethodmatrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work’, Journal ofApplied Psychology, 75(5), 547-560

Campbell, J.P.(1982), ‘Editorial: Some remarks from the outgoing editor’, Journal of AppliedPsychology, 67(6), 691-700.

0 k* H- T) ~+ C9 P8 z2 ]. I2 e

Campbell, D.T.& Fiske, D.W. (1959), ‘Convergent and discriminant validation by themultitrait-multimethod matrix’, Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.

5 Z* R; _8 L" l+ Y/ n
, h# `0 G5 H! y5 W8 P

Churchill,G.A.(1979), ‘A paradigm for developing better measures of marketingconstructs’, Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73.

Crampton, S.,& Wagner, J.A. (1994) Percept-percept inflation in microorganizationalresearch: An investigation of prevalence and effect, Journal of AppliedPsychology, 79(1), 67-76.

* Z" x  @$ `. L7 }7 t
7 I. ^3 }& a; u3 ^0 \

Cote, J. A., &Buckley, M. R. (August 1987). ‘Estimating trait, method, and error variance:Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies’ Journal of MarketingResearch, 24, 315-8.

+ x, J" F7 l9 H  j/ E  i7 I9 W

Cote, J. A., &Buckley, M. R. (March 1988), ‘Measurement error and theory in consumerresearch: An illustration of the importance of construct validation’ Journal ofConsumer Research, 14, 579-582.

Donaldson, S. I.and Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2002), ‘Understanding self-report bias inorganizational behavior research’, Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2),245-260.

5 D: d. W! s0 M( ~7 Y$ L

Doty, D. H., &Glick, W. H.  (1998).  Common methods bias: Does common methodsvariance really bias results?  Organizational Research Methods, 1,374-406.

/ L7 |+ C! {% O

Evans, M. (1985),‘A monte carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderatedmultiple regression analysis’, Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionsProcesses, 36, 305-323.

4 d$ I5 T) F6 N8 ~/ l
+ j9 Y: N' V' h( ~1 b9 B

Glick, W.H.,Jenkins, G.D. JR & Gupta, N. (1986), ‘Method versus substance: How strongare underlying relations between job characteristics and attitudinal outcomes’,Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 441-464.

# m2 t/ s) _" O

Howard, G. S.(1994), ‘Why do people say nasty things about self-reports?’ Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 15, 399-404.

( m8 ]1 i" Y% u! M3 j7 C0 D% e

Johns, G.(1994),‘How often were you absent? A review of the use of self-reported absence data’,Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 574-591.

  {8 j( w/ O1 W+ J9 L" e. w

Kline, T.J.B,Sulsky, L.M., & Rever-Moriyama, S.D. (July 2000), ‘Common methodvariance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection’, TheJournal of Psychology, 34(4), 401-421.

5 W9 R% X2 b: b: l7 ~& [

MacKenzie, S. B.(Summer 2003), ‘The dangers of poor construct conceptualization’ Academy for MarketingScience Journal, 31, 3.

7 p" {. y2 l7 y6 K

Meade, A. W.,Watson, A.M., & Kroustalis, C.M.,  ‘Assessing common method bias in organizational research’, paperpresented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial andOrganizational Psychology, New York.

Podsakoff, P.M.,MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., & Bachrach,, D.G., (2000) ‘Organizationalcitizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empiricalliterature and suggestions for future research’, Journal of Management 26 (3),513-563.

& r/ f1 L6 v/ {

Podsakoff, P.M.,MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, N.P., & Lee, JY., (2003), ‘Common method biasesin behavioral research: A critical review of literature and recommendedremedies’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.

) \/ ]7 w4 f5 E/ H7 E
- q% V  H8 }" D# o+ D' ?, U, D

Podsakoff, P.M.& Organ, D.W. (1986), ‘Self-reports in organizational research: problemsand prospects’, Journal of Management, 12(4), 1986.

Schmitt, N.(1994), ‘Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement’, Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 15, 393-398

1 `1 {+ ~4 U2 O% j7 T% ^5 q
* o" w1 A7 g9 n  w& |. p1 r

Schwarz, Norbert(Feb. 1999), ‘Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers’, AmericanPsychologist, 54(2), 93-105.

9 L  a- `1 g2 {* l: o

Spector, P. E.(Aug. 1987), ‘Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect andperceptions at work: Myth or significant problem?’ Journal of AppliedPsychology, 72(3), 438-443.

Spector, P.E.(1994), ‘Using self-report questionnaires in OBresearch: a comment on the use of a controversial method’, Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 15, 385-392.

Spector, P. E. (April 2006), ‘Method variancein organizational research: truth or urban legend?’ Organizational ResearchMethods, 9(2), 221-232.

3 B% ~7 d& p, c) }1 l* _
. J( L1 b1 A; ^6 a, ]+ i: a

Williams, L.J.& Brown, B.K. (1994), ‘Method variance in organizational behavior and humanresources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesistesting’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 185-209.

- A- W5 T7 s  ?

Williams, L. J., Cote, J.A., & Buckley, M. R., (1989), ‘Lack of methodvariance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality of artifact?’Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462-468.

: l: @' }. q  I3 J/ `3 n& q

rwxld

非常感谢分享，有很多没看过的。

Kenneth

香港時下年青人流行的“潮語”中形容詞有五級，分別是「好」、「勁」、「超」、「爆」、「喪」。
比如喜歡中有：「好喜歡」、「勁喜歡」、「超喜歡」、「喜歡到爆」、「喪喜歡」。
mythi1949的 common method variance 文章分享極為大公無私，應該歸入「喪」感謝等級！

myth1949

Kenneth 发表于 2011-10-15 16:29
香港時下年青人流行的“潮語”中形容詞有五級，分別是「好」、「勁」、「超」、「爆」、「喪」。
/ N2 T$ U! f/ r# W8 H" d9 j7 q比如喜歡 ...

' n8 u# I: Y0 ~8 J6 E+ ~不敢当啊！

) f% i0 W/ B( F1 q4 e, {若没有Kenny在大陆的奉献，我今生可能不会考虑写英文论文，相信大陆很多学生和青年教师也和我一样。

虽然英文论文的写作需要过很多“关”，希望大家和我都可以坚持走下去。