设为首页 登录 注册
首页 中人社区 中人博客
查看: 1995|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Method Bias的文献

[复制链接]

9

主题

5

听众

198

积分

书生

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

注册时间
2010-8-18
最后登录
2014-2-3
积分
198
精华
0
主题
9
帖子
25
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-10-13 22:51:32 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
本帖最后由 myth1949 于 2011-10-13 22:52 编辑
8 I- E# H5 G; u- X( g4 G
1 k1 J) H: X2 G
Avolio, B.J.,Yammarino, F.J. & Bass, B.M. (1991), ‘Identifying common methods variancewith data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue’, Journalof Management, 17(3), 571-587.
' ~& v- m5 P1 h2 s4 H' P7 }5 G

3 k( h5 c( T5 I7 F
Bagozzi, R.P.& Yi, Y. (1990), ‘Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethodmatrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work’, Journal ofApplied Psychology, 75(5), 547-560

: T* g5 p  w' b  Y  {
* J3 s* v4 e. Z# ]  S4 s9 `
Campbell, J.P.(1982), ‘Editorial: Some remarks from the outgoing editor’, Journal of AppliedPsychology, 67(6), 691-700.
6 D- @  D  S3 s0 A' w4 C. Z9 q- {+ S; I$ W
2 D, j3 f' {8 j& }
Campbell, D.T.& Fiske, D.W. (1959), ‘Convergent and discriminant validation by themultitrait-multimethod matrix’, Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.
/ [' @6 a: w3 x  {$ J- w- P

# s/ u$ n. k! T2 b" Q
Churchill,G.A.(1979), ‘A paradigm for developing better measures of marketingconstructs’, Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73.

" o, v- H0 L) i) `# s$ N) z' l
" q9 @6 {( l& A' J; B; l
Crampton, S.,& Wagner, J.A. (1994) Percept-percept inflation in microorganizationalresearch: An investigation of prevalence and effect, Journal of AppliedPsychology, 79(1), 67-76.
4 @/ V2 f7 Z) m* L: M' E  Y

- ]; \. n: `3 |6 w* B
Cote, J. A., &Buckley, M. R. (August 1987). ‘Estimating trait, method, and error variance:Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies’ Journal of MarketingResearch, 24, 315-8.

/ P! x0 P; Z1 x5 G5 d8 X& ?$ j) |
7 o+ r! v, q* ^6 M
Cote, J. A., &Buckley, M. R. (March 1988), ‘Measurement error and theory in consumerresearch: An illustration of the importance of construct validation’ Journal ofConsumer Research, 14, 579-582.

( ~9 m1 U4 J) u$ I2 Q2 B4 u- W6 V5 t2 t$ o
Donaldson, S. I.and Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2002), ‘Understanding self-report bias inorganizational behavior research’, Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2),245-260.
, }1 ^2 m- c7 C& g
6 f7 |* H# ]: `: `: |
Doty, D. H., &Glick, W. H.  (1998).  Common methods bias: Does common methodsvariance really bias results?  Organizational Research Methods, 1,374-406.
: j, i, U8 _* g6 \' w

6 Y2 o! K  J/ H
Evans, M. (1985),‘A monte carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderatedmultiple regression analysis’, Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionsProcesses, 36, 305-323.
) u0 _8 n  U& S$ ?; p& ]& z

+ l* J! R' G/ h+ y0 K
Glick, W.H.,Jenkins, G.D. JR & Gupta, N. (1986), ‘Method versus substance: How strongare underlying relations between job characteristics and attitudinal outcomes’,Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 441-464.

6 U/ n, u  Q$ O4 s9 q
( d1 N! P9 R6 `
Howard, G. S.(1994), ‘Why do people say nasty things about self-reports?’ Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 15, 399-404.

0 \5 n- Z& o: L
! _" ~1 K, q7 R2 c8 P, L
Johns, G.(1994),‘How often were you absent? A review of the use of self-reported absence data’,Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 574-591.

" F, Y0 i1 D7 H8 c% p: V! b( l
- F: S2 s  k, a: W8 e9 \
Kline, T.J.B,Sulsky, L.M., & Rever-Moriyama, S.D. (July 2000), ‘Common methodvariance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection’, TheJournal of Psychology, 34(4), 401-421.

9 ^7 o# c' c5 Y; |* X, M. {
5 V# p2 f4 V) u9 K$ `
MacKenzie, S. B.(Summer 2003), ‘The dangers of poor construct conceptualization’ Academy for MarketingScience Journal, 31, 3.

  j3 |9 K: t) O: l& d8 y0 I! M/ L+ Q7 ~' o
Meade, A. W.,Watson, A.M., & Kroustalis, C.M.,  ‘Assessing common method bias in organizational research’, paperpresented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial andOrganizational Psychology, New York.

' H" m! v3 f2 ]3 L. t/ Z1 A8 M, J. u' R% {/ t' \) i. P
Podsakoff, P.M.,MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., & Bachrach,, D.G., (2000) ‘Organizationalcitizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empiricalliterature and suggestions for future research’, Journal of Management 26 (3),513-563.

. B3 b) E3 M8 D: E8 x* H& j; F% |) Y
- R, _* C6 @! o
Podsakoff, P.M.,MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, N.P., & Lee, JY., (2003), ‘Common method biasesin behavioral research: A critical review of literature and recommendedremedies’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
: L$ ~& }' n9 S
+ N2 n. Y3 i7 c) X6 p' A" G5 ]
Podsakoff, P.M.& Organ, D.W. (1986), ‘Self-reports in organizational research: problemsand prospects’, Journal of Management, 12(4), 1986.

& ~) O0 W7 D. v+ v
! U9 |5 K& j7 J3 \9 @5 `# E1 s
Schmitt, N.(1994), ‘Method bias: The importance of theory and measurement’, Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 15, 393-398

  ~# X, j1 L' A4 h# @. h* t: H* W
/ `4 ~. \  q! S: F/ E4 R, }+ _. s
Schwarz, Norbert(Feb. 1999), ‘Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers’, AmericanPsychologist, 54(2), 93-105.
( C+ B# s9 K$ w7 Z* S+ A

! ]7 b, \) k3 ]! m0 ?1 y( a# q
Spector, P. E.(Aug. 1987), ‘Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect andperceptions at work: Myth or significant problem?’ Journal of AppliedPsychology, 72(3), 438-443.

0 p) J% S  M3 X! [5 M6 Q4 u  r/ o
( \; B4 i' W3 i
Spector, P.E.(1994), ‘Using self-report questionnaires in OBresearch: a comment on the use of a controversial method’, Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 15, 385-392.

0 d& S& Q- f# T7 ?% D. L
# G+ |  P* ?3 I6 g. C5 }
Spector, P. E. (April 2006), ‘Method variancein organizational research: truth or urban legend?’ Organizational ResearchMethods, 9(2), 221-232.

' f: l, J, i6 S5 g  X. o: D/ d6 C& `# N; Q
Williams, L.J.& Brown, B.K. (1994), ‘Method variance in organizational behavior and humanresources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesistesting’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 185-209.

/ O* t- U4 k: u" H0 X$ L' Y6 a' R
9 r$ x. n  L4 f+ P* |
Williams, L. J., Cote, J.A., & Buckley, M. R., (1989), ‘Lack of methodvariance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality of artifact?’Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462-468.

, n/ b9 E1 ?" Q, Y9 q3 G6 C( D
We are captives of our own identities, living in prisons of our own creation.

I do admit that at any moment we are prisoners caught in the framework of our theories;
our expectations; our past experi
rwxld    

11

主题

4

听众

6296

积分

贡士

Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15Rank: 15

注册时间
2006-2-22
最后登录
2018-4-25
积分
6296
精华
0
主题
11
帖子
188
沙发
发表于 2011-10-15 10:12:21 |只看该作者
非常感谢分享,有很多没看过的。
回复

使用道具 举报

69

主题

220

听众

2万

积分

中人网专家

Rank: 50Rank: 50Rank: 50Rank: 50Rank: 50

注册时间
2003-1-21
最后登录
2016-11-27
积分
29016
精华
0
主题
69
帖子
1438

2009年度勋章

板凳
发表于 2011-10-15 16:29:25 |只看该作者
香港時下年青人流行的“潮語”中形容詞有五級,分別是「好」、「勁」、「超」、「爆」、「喪」。
  U) }. ?! x; h& c6 P: Z比如喜歡中有:「好喜歡」、「勁喜歡」、「超喜歡」、「喜歡到爆」、「喪喜歡」。$ z5 Y/ s8 y) D- J# U0 G# [
mythi1949的 common method variance 文章分享極為大公無私,應該歸入「喪」感謝等級!
回复

使用道具 举报

9

主题

5

听众

198

积分

书生

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

注册时间
2010-8-18
最后登录
2014-2-3
积分
198
精华
0
主题
9
帖子
25
地板
发表于 2011-10-21 12:14:24 |只看该作者
Kenneth 发表于 2011-10-15 16:29
2 `7 R' T: G, p0 A" i+ p香港時下年青人流行的“潮語”中形容詞有五級,分別是「好」、「勁」、「超」、「爆」、「喪」。3 s; n1 F5 }/ o4 e6 d
比如喜歡 ...
4 b  `8 P* I5 {  E7 J3 a
不敢当啊!
- _5 H1 A& }% S& P: H9 [6 j/ X' u0 n0 b, i
若没有Kenny在大陆的奉献,我今生可能不会考虑写英文论文,相信大陆很多学生和青年教师也和我一样。
$ ^, \* D) f4 R* f( n. T7 ]6 n! {' e2 j" w5 K/ `( X
虽然英文论文的写作需要过很多“关”,希望大家和我都可以坚持走下去。
We are captives of our own identities, living in prisons of our own creation.

I do admit that at any moment we are prisoners caught in the framework of our theories;
our expectations; our past experi
回复

使用道具 举报