- 最后登录
- 2005-12-14
- 注册时间
- 2003-3-6
- 威望
- 0
- 金钱
- 3068
- 贡献
- 29
- 阅读权限
- 70
- 积分
- 3097
- 日志
- 0
- 记录
- 0
- 帖子
- 649
- 主题
- 9
- 精华
- 0
- 好友
- 0
该用户从未签到 - 注册时间
- 2003-3-6
- 最后登录
- 2005-12-14
- 积分
- 3097
- 精华
- 0
- 主题
- 9
- 帖子
- 649
|
this phenomenon is very typical
& J# w7 U- R& u* |" l( `% Cbut the company also should check up their own action.$ O2 ~& P4 m2 C4 g2 |
for example:1 t6 v' O4 p$ W- y3 v
salary
- i$ V0 {! ?' S8 `7 l5 E( Mof course the candidate want more. but the company want to pay less. all is reasonable, so it is no need to criticized the candidate.0 K) J0 L- ^6 ?. U/ U
if the company think the people is worth to pay more, you should give the salary he expected, or you cann't retente him/her for a long time., V, s( w- T! V, q" f- n
as the saying goes, the people we paid is more important than the people paid for us.0 z" @" A7 N% q- { _4 F
if the company have not wake up to this, only want to give less salary, this company is not competitive and cann't stand for a long time. i have never seen a famous company is closehanded in salary.
# k1 p& r; e: Nibm is not, microsoft is not, hp is not.
7 J7 V6 e2 _% Z* g Q |
|